From: Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>
To: Nicolae Mihalache <mache@abcpages.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, learner.study@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:58:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <w2i7efa8a7d1004021058yadbda1bavb1e96a3f6f3bbd70@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB5BFB3.2030400@abcpages.com>
Hi Nicolae:
Can you please let me know:
- what HDDs (rpm etc.) of your system?
- which linux kernel are you using?
Thanks!
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Nicolae Mihalache <mache@abcpages.com> wrote:
> I see some benchmarks performed at boot time on my Xeon E5410 2.33GHz
> that shows
> ...
> [ 37.935702] raid6: sse2x1 3562 MB/s
> [ 38.003702] raid6: sse2x2 6422 MB/s
> [ 38.003702] raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (6422 MB/s)
>
> This speed is higher that the DDR2 667 theoretical speed of
> 5333MBs/sec. So I expect the limiting factor will never be the CPU, so
> it would not make sense to use multi-core.
>
> Am I completely off?
>
>
> nicolae
>
>
> Learner Study wrote:
>> Hi Keld:
>>
>> Do we have raid5/6 numbers for linux on any multi-core CPU? Most of
>> the benchmarks I have seen on wiki show raid5 perf to be ~150MB/s with
>> single core CPUs. How does that scale with multiple cores? Something
>> like intel's jasper forest???
>>
>> If available, can u pls point me to numbers with multi-core CPU?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42:57PM -0700, Learner Study wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Linux Raid Experts:
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at following wiki on raid perf on linux:
>>>>
>>>> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Performance
>>>>
>>>> and notice that the performance numbers are with 2.6.12 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Do we perf numbers for:
>>>> - latest kernel (something like 2.6.27 / 2.6.31)
>>>> - raid 5 and 6
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please point me to appropriate link?
>>>>
>>> The link mentioned above has a number of other performance reports, for other levels of the kernel.
>>> Anyway you should be able to get comparable results for newer kernels, the kernel has not become
>>> slower since 2.6.12 on RAID.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> Keld
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-02 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-31 19:42 Linux Raid performance Learner Study
2010-03-31 20:15 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 3:07 ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 9:58 ` Nicolae Mihalache
2010-04-02 17:58 ` Learner Study [this message]
2010-04-02 11:05 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 11:18 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 17:55 ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 21:14 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 21:37 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 11:20 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 15:56 ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 1:58 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 0:10 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 0:39 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03 1:00 ` John Robinson
2010-04-03 1:14 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 1:32 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03 1:37 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 3:06 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 3:00 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 19:27 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 18:14 ` MRK
2010-04-03 19:56 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-04 15:00 ` MRK
2010-04-04 18:26 ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 18:46 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-04 21:28 ` Jools Wills
2010-04-04 22:38 ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-05 10:07 ` Learner Study
2010-04-05 16:35 ` John Robinson
2010-04-04 22:24 ` Guy Watkins
2010-04-05 13:49 ` Drew
2010-04-04 23:24 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 11:20 ` MRK
2010-04-05 19:49 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 21:03 ` Drew
2010-04-05 22:20 ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 23:49 ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-14 20:50 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=w2i7efa8a7d1004021058yadbda1bavb1e96a3f6f3bbd70@mail.gmail.com \
--to=learner.study@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mache@abcpages.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).