linux-raid.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>
To: Nicolae Mihalache <mache@abcpages.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, learner.study@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Linux Raid performance
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 10:58:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <w2i7efa8a7d1004021058yadbda1bavb1e96a3f6f3bbd70@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BB5BFB3.2030400@abcpages.com>

Hi Nicolae:

Can you please let me know:
- what HDDs (rpm etc.) of your system?
- which linux kernel are you using?

Thanks!

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 2:58 AM, Nicolae Mihalache <mache@abcpages.com> wrote:
> I see some benchmarks performed at boot time on my Xeon E5410 2.33GHz
> that shows
> ...
> [   37.935702] raid6: sse2x1    3562 MB/s
> [   38.003702] raid6: sse2x2    6422 MB/s
> [   38.003702] raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (6422 MB/s)
>
> This  speed is higher that the DDR2 667 theoretical speed of
> 5333MBs/sec. So I expect the limiting factor will never be the CPU, so
> it would not make sense to use multi-core.
>
> Am I completely off?
>
>
> nicolae
>
>
> Learner Study wrote:
>> Hi Keld:
>>
>> Do we have raid5/6 numbers for linux on any multi-core CPU? Most of
>> the benchmarks I have seen on wiki show raid5 perf to be ~150MB/s with
>> single core CPUs. How does that scale with multiple cores? Something
>> like intel's jasper forest???
>>
>> If available, can u pls point me to numbers with multi-core CPU?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Keld Simonsen <keld@keldix.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42:57PM -0700, Learner Study wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Linux Raid Experts:
>>>>
>>>> I was looking at following wiki on raid perf on linux:
>>>>
>>>> https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Performance
>>>>
>>>> and notice that the performance numbers are with 2.6.12 kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Do we perf numbers for:
>>>> - latest kernel (something like 2.6.27 / 2.6.31)
>>>> - raid 5 and 6
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please point me to appropriate link?
>>>>
>>> The link mentioned above has a number of other performance reports, for other levels of the kernel.
>>> Anyway you should be able to get comparable results for newer kernels, the kernel has not become
>>> slower since 2.6.12 on RAID.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> Keld
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-02 17:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-31 19:42 Linux Raid performance Learner Study
2010-03-31 20:15 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02  3:07   ` Learner Study
2010-04-02  9:58     ` Nicolae Mihalache
2010-04-02 17:58       ` Learner Study [this message]
2010-04-02 11:05     ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 11:18       ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 17:55       ` Learner Study
2010-04-02 21:14         ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-02 21:37           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 11:20             ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03 15:56               ` Learner Study
2010-04-04  1:58                 ` Keld Simonsen
2010-04-03  0:10           ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  0:39         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:00           ` John Robinson
2010-04-03  1:14           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  1:32             ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-03  1:37               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03  3:06                 ` Learner Study
2010-04-03  3:00             ` Learner Study
2010-04-03 19:27               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-03 18:14             ` MRK
2010-04-03 19:56               ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-04 15:00                 ` MRK
2010-04-04 18:26                   ` Learner Study
2010-04-04 18:46                     ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-04 21:28                       ` Jools Wills
2010-04-04 22:38                         ` Mark Knecht
2010-04-05 10:07                           ` Learner Study
2010-04-05 16:35                             ` John Robinson
2010-04-04 22:24                       ` Guy Watkins
2010-04-05 13:49                         ` Drew
2010-04-04 23:24                   ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 11:20                     ` MRK
2010-04-05 19:49                       ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 21:03                         ` Drew
2010-04-05 22:20                           ` Richard Scobie
2010-04-05 23:49                           ` Roger Heflin
2010-04-14 20:50             ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=w2i7efa8a7d1004021058yadbda1bavb1e96a3f6f3bbd70@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=learner.study@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mache@abcpages.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).