From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raid1 - mismatches after resuming interrupted recovery
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:58:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfj1tccpcuc.fsf@carbonite.lan.trained-monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559AAAAA.2030904@stratus.com> (Nate Dailey's message of "Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:19:54 -0400")
Nate Dailey <nate.dailey@stratus.com> writes:
> I've found that if I interrupt a recovery by removing the target
> device, do IO before the recovery checkpoint, then re-add the device
> and let the recovery complete, the mismatch_cnt is non-zero after
> doing a check.
Neil,
While I am on the nagging path, here is another one.
Jes
> Here's exactly what I'm doing:
>
> - create a 5 GB raid1 with internal bitmap
>
> - do a check, verify zero mismatch_cnt
>
> - remove one member device
>
> - dd 256MB with 2GB seek
>
> - lower sync_speed_min/max to 500
>
> - re-add removed device
>
> - wait 15 sec
>
> - remove the same member device again
>
> - dd 1MB with 1 GB seek
>
> - restore sync_speed_min/max to system defaults
>
> - re-add removed device
>
> - when recovery competes, do another check
>
> At this point the mismatch_cnt is non-zero.
>
>
> I originally hit this on RHEL 7.1, but tested 4.1.1 from kernel.org
> and it happens there too.
>
> I'm out of my league in terms of trying to fix this, but would be
> happy to test a fix. I wonder if it's really necessary to resume a
> bitmap recovery from the checkpoint? Wouldn't the bitmap always
> reflect what needs to be copied?
>
> Nate
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-30 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-06 16:19 raid1 - mismatches after resuming interrupted recovery Nate Dailey
2015-10-30 15:58 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2015-10-30 16:57 ` Nate Dailey
2015-10-30 18:07 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfj1tccpcuc.fsf@carbonite.lan.trained-monkey.org \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nate.dailey@stratus.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).