From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [dm-devel] WANTED new maintainer for Linux/md (and mdadm) Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 15:28:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k2o849j5.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <0AAF8A3C-BE70-4510-A8EA-F64B2F4A0B4D@redhat.com> <878u40ak6u.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <878u40ak6u.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> (NeilBrown's message of "Fri, 08 Jan 2016 13:17:45 +1100") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: NeilBrown Cc: Brassow Jonathan , device-mapper development , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, LKML , "J. Bruce Fields" , Phil Turmel , Linus Torvalds , Doug Ledford , Xiao Ni List-Id: linux-raid.ids NeilBrown writes: > On Thu, Jan 07 2016, Jes Sorensen wrote: > >> Brassow Jonathan writes: >>> Many thanks Neil for all the work you=E2=80=99ve done and the help = you gave me >>> while working on the DM/MD interactions bits. I=E2=80=99m happy yo= u are >>> sticking around for the raid1-cluster and raid5-journal bits and I=E2= =80=99m >>> interested to see what comes out of those. >>> >>> I know there are a number of folks around Red Hat who are capable a= nd >>> possibly interested to share the load. They should be back from PT= O >>> soon and we=E2=80=99ll make sure they know about the opportunity. >> >> Thanks Neil! >> >> I mentioned to Neil last year that I could probably be convinced, >> bribed, shamed, into maintaining mdadm. > > I realise that is somewhat tongue-in-cheek, but I am certainly not > looking for someone who needs to be convinced, bribed, or shamed. I'= m > hoping for someone who will weigh the pros and cons, decide this is a > contribution they are willing (and maybe even eager) to make, and wil= l > step up and do so. And I suspect that behind that facade of > reluctance, that is what you are really offering. Thanks. > > I propose to make one last release of mdadm either next week or the l= ast > week of January. I plan to call it "3.4" in acknowledgment of the ne= w > cluster and raid5-journal functionality. > If you were to take it from there, I would be grateful. Hi Neil, I wouldn't have offered to take on mdadm if I hadn't meant it, even if = I like making the wording sound silly :) I feel I can do a decent job at it and the task should be reasonable in scope. If someone is dying to take it on, I am not going to stand in their way, but I feel mdadm need= s a maintainer and it's a worthy effort. We'll have to figure out the logistics, and I'd like to coordinate with who takes on drivers/md Cheers, Jes > > Thanks, > NeilBrown > >> >> The kernel MD stack I think really needs a team to run it. There is = just >> too much internal knowledge sitting in Neil's head and I personally = am a >> little scared of taking on that. Shaohua Li would be a good candidat= e >> for that team IMHO. >> >> Cheers, >> Jes >> >> >>> thanks, >>> brassow >>> >>>> On Dec 21, 2015, at 12:10 AM, NeilBrown wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> hi, >>>> I became maintainer for md (Linux Software RAID) in late 2001 and = on >>>> the whole it has been fun and a valuable experience. But I have b= een >>>> losing interest in recent years (https://lwn.net/Articles/511073/)= and >>>> as was mentioned at the kernel summit, I would like to resign. So= me >>>> years ago I managed to hand over nfsd to the excellent Bruce Field= s, >>>> but I do not seem to have the gift that Linus has of attracting >>>> maintainers. While there are a number of people who know quite a = bit >>>> about md and/or have contributed to development, there is no obvio= us >>>> candidate for replacement maintainer - no one who has already been >>>> doing significant parts of the maintainer role. >>>>=20 >>>> So I have decided to fall back on the mechanism by which I ended u= p >>>> being maintainer in the first place. I will create a vacuum and h= ope >>>> someone fills it (yes: I was sucked-in....). So as of 1st Februar= y >>>> 2016 I will be resigning. >>>>=20 >>>> At the kernel summit in October Linus talked about the value of >>>> maintainership teams (https://lwn.net/Articles/662979/). I think = it >>>> would be great if a (small) team formed to continue to oversee md >>>> rather than just a single individual (or maybe the dm team could e= xtend >>>> to include md??). If I had managed to be part of a team rather th= an >>>> "going it alone" for so long, I might feel less tired of the whole >>>> thing now. >>>>=20 >>>> I don't see it as my place to appoint that team or any individuals= , or >>>> even to nominate any candidates. A very important attribute of a >>>> maintainer is that they need to care about the code and the subsys= tem >>>> and I cannot tell other people to care (or even know if they do). = It >>>> is really up to individuals to volunteer. A few people have been >>>> mentioned to me in earlier less-public conversations. Any of them= may >>>> well be suitable, but I would rather they named themselves if >>>> interested. >>>>=20 >>>> So I'm hoping to get one or more volunteers to be maintainer: >>>> - to gather and manage patches and outstanding issues, >>>> - to review patches or get them reviewed >>>> - to follow up bug reports and get them resolved >>>> - to feed patches upstream, maybe directly to Linus, >>>> maybe through some other maintainer, depending on what >>>> relationships already exist or can be formed, >>>> - to guide the longer term direction (saying "no" is important >>>> sometimes), >>>> - to care, >>>> but also to be aware that maintainership takes real effort and tim= e, as >>>> does anything that is really worthwhile. >>>>=20 >>>> This all applies to mdadm as well as md (except you would ultimate= ly >>>> *be* upstream for mdadm, not needing to send it anywhere). Even i= f a >>>> clear team doesn't form it would be great if different people >>>> maintained mdadm and md. >>>>=20 >>>> One part of the job that I have put a lot of time in to is followi= ng >>>> the linux-raid@vger.kernel.org list and providing support. This m= akes >>>> people feel good about md and so more adventurous in using it. >>>> Consequently I tend to hear about bugs and usability issues nice a= nd >>>> early (well before paying customers hit them in most cases) and th= at is >>>> a big win. >>>> In recent times I've been doing less of this and have been absolut= ely >>>> thrilled that the gap has been more than filled by other very comp= etent >>>> community members. Not developers particular but a number of md u= sers >>>> have been providing excellent support. I'd particularly like to >>>> high-light Phil Turmel who is very forthcoming with excellent advi= ce, >>>> but he is certainly not the only one who deserves a lot of thanks. >>>> So "Thank you" to everyone who answers questions on linux-raid. >>>>=20 >>>> This would be a good place for any future maintainer to hang out t= o >>>> receive wisdom as well as to provide support. >>>>=20 >>>> I will still be around. I can certainly help out in some sort of >>>> mentor role, and can probably be convinced to review patches and >>>> comment on designs. But I really want to head towards spending le= ss >>>> time on md (there are so many other interesting things to learn ab= out). >>>>=20 >>>> So: if anyone is interested - please announce yourself, ask questi= ons >>>> and start doing things. I have no clear idea about how a transiti= on >>>> will happen. That is really up to you (plural). Take the bull by = the >>>> horns and start *being* a maintainer(team). I won't get in your w= ay >>>> and I'll help where I can. >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks, >>>> NeilBrown >>>>=20 >>>> P.S. I'm committed to continue to work with the raid5-journal effo= rt >>>> From Facebook and the raid1-cluster effort from SUSE and the >>>> line-in-the-sand of 1st February won't affect my support for those= =2E >>>> -- >>>> dm-devel mailing list >>>> dm-devel@redhat.com >>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rai= d" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid= " in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html