From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: md/raid1: Improve another size determination in setup_conf()
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:01:46 -0400
Message-ID: <wrfjeg3ob8vp.fsf@redhat.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
        <786843ef-4b6f-eb04-7326-2f6f5b408826@users.sourceforge.net>
        <9831fce9-d689-89e4-dec8-50cadcd13fdd@users.sourceforge.net>
        <CAFLxGvx0Fr-WNvKYACdvNiZwYzHW4ocna9HPH8J_WPSXWc+ngg@mail.gmail.com>
        <20161007075345.GB6039@mwanda>
        <77d68bcd-1ae4-4808-fc0b-6183ae5fb6c4@users.sourceforge.net>
        <wrfjzimcbbft.fsf@redhat.com>
        <10ff33b4-44f0-eaea-8549-79a6ba250a2a@users.sourceforge.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <10ff33b4-44f0-eaea-8549-79a6ba250a2a@users.sourceforge.net> (SF
        Markus Elfring's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:20:16 +0200")
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>, Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
List-Id: linux-raid.ids

SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> writes:
>>> How do you value compliance with coding styles?
>>
>> The Linux Coding Style is not a law,
>
> How serious can such guidelines become for software developers?
>
>> nor is it at all perfect.
>
> I got a similar impression. But are there enough items where a mostly clear
> guidance is specified?
>
>> You clearly misunderstood how Linux development work
>
> I got an other impression.
>
>> and you are doing a great job wasting everyone's time with this patchset.
>
> Would you like to reject any update steps for the affected source files
> from this patch series?
>
> Can it "accidentally" happen that some of them will be really worth
> also for your precious software development attention?

Given that none of your patches fix any real bugs and you do your best
to ignore any guidance you have been given, I do reject your entire
patchset and you can consider this a NACK for this entire series.

I get the impression you obtain your response to any email from M-x
doctor.

Jes