From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com,
pawel.baldysiak@intel.com, artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Remove: container should wait for an array to release a drive
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 13:35:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfjfur4nrft.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469001665-13648-1-git-send-email-tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com> (Tomasz Majchrzak's message of "Wed, 20 Jul 2016 10:01:05 +0200")
Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com> writes:
> A 'faulty' drive is being removed from a container after it has been
> released by an array, however there is a race there. The drive is
> released asynchronously by a monitor but sometimes it doesn't happen
> before container checks it. It results in a container refusing to remove
> a drive as it still seems to be a part of some array.
>
> It seems 'ping_monitor' could be a solution here to assure monitor has
> had a chance to process the events, however it doesn't resolve the
> problem - sometimes an array has to request a release of the drive few
> times (as the array is busy) and single 'ping_monitor' call is not
> sufficient. As there is no way to query monitor progress, it forces us
> to retry a check several times before an error is returned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Majchrzak <tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com>
> ---
> Manage.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Manage.c b/Manage.c
> index e2e88b8..7f8eb88 100644
> --- a/Manage.c
> +++ b/Manage.c
> @@ -1125,19 +1125,31 @@ int Manage_remove(struct supertype *tst, int fd, struct mddev_dev *dv,
> */
> if (rdev == 0)
> ret = -1;
> - else
> - ret = sysfs_unique_holder(devnm, rdev);
> - if (ret == 0) {
> - pr_err("%s is not a member, cannot remove.\n",
> - dv->devname);
> - close(lfd);
> - return -1;
> - }
> - if (ret >= 2) {
> - pr_err("%s is still in use, cannot remove.\n",
> - dv->devname);
> - close(lfd);
> - return -1;
> + else {
> + /* The drive has already been set to 'faulty', however monitor might
> + * not have had time to process it and the drive might still have
> + * an entry in the 'holders' directory. Try a few times to avoid
> + * a false error */
Sorry for nagging again, but code is 80 characters wide, and comments
should not go beyond the 80 character limit - just like in the
kernel. The preferred format is (with applicable indentation):
/*
* Blah blah blah blah blah
* .... more blah blah blah
*/
Thanks,
Jes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 8:01 [PATCH v2] Remove: container should wait for an array to release a drive Tomasz Majchrzak
2016-07-20 17:35 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfjfur4nrft.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=aleksey.obitotskiy@intel.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pawel.baldysiak@intel.com \
--cc=tomasz.majchrzak@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).