From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tests/03r5assemV1 issues
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 18:07:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wrfjpq8c96c9.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120703114459.29c21b8f@notabene.brown> (NeilBrown's message of "Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:44:59 +1000")
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> writes:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 15:24:43 +0200 Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> I am trying to get the test suite stable on RHEL, but I see a lot of
>> failures in 03r5assemV1, in particular between these two cases:
>>
>> mdadm -A $md1 -u $uuid $devlist
>> check state U_U
>> eval $tst
>>
>> mdadm -A $md1 --name=one $devlist
>> check state U_U
>> check spares 1
>> eval $tst
>>
>> I have tested it with the latest upstream kernel as well and see the
>> same problems. I suspect it is simply the box that is too fast, ending
>> up with the raid check completing inbetween the two test cases?
>>
>> Are you seeing the same thing there? I tried playing with the max speed
>> variable but it doesn't really seem to make any difference.
>>
>> Any ideas for what we can be done to make this case more resilient to
>> false positives? I guess one option would be to re-create the array
>> inbetween each test?
>
> Maybe it really is a bug?
> The test harness set the resync speed to be very slow. A fast box will get
> through the test more quickly and be more likely to see the array still
> syncing.
>
> I'll try to make time to look more closely.
> But I wouldn't discount the possibility that the second "mdadm -A" is
> short-circuiting the recovery somehow.
That could certainly explain what I am seeing. I noticed it doesn't
happen every single time in the same place (from memory), but it is
mostly in that spot in my case.
Even if I trimmed the max speed down to 50 it still happens.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-03 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-02 13:24 tests/03r5assemV1 issues Jes Sorensen
2012-07-03 1:44 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-03 16:07 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2012-07-04 5:23 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-06 9:59 ` Jes Sorensen
2012-07-11 4:20 ` NeilBrown
2012-07-11 4:28 ` Roman Mamedov
2012-07-11 7:18 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wrfjpq8c96c9.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).