From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Partial Parity Log for MD RAID 5 Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 08:29:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20161205153113.7268-1-artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com> <87fum04m0m.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <84c59771-48b7-da47-3497-c82c6c6939c9@intel.com> <20161207170906.sthdxswufwk5fqhn@kernel.org> <20161214194726.4to3rnqyrqlqlx7t@kernel.org> <20161216232421.x6sb4goclzyasu6k@kernel.org> <84d3a102-faef-13ae-44e2-2f9a4d561c37@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <84d3a102-faef-13ae-44e2-2f9a4d561c37@intel.com> (Artur Paszkiewicz's message of "Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:01:05 +0100") Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Artur Paszkiewicz Cc: Shaohua Li , NeilBrown , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-raid.ids Artur Paszkiewicz writes: > On 01/03/2017 04:42 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> Artur, >> >> Did you make any progress getting the alignment issue resolved? >> >> I'd really like to get an mdadm release out the door this week, so >> getting this resolved would be awesome. Hint hint ;) > > Jes, > > The alignment issue is fixed but I'm currently making changes in the > kernel part after comments from Neil. This also requires modifications > in mdadm, maybe even more than in the kernel. I need a few more days to > finish this, I'll be sending the next version of the patches probably > next week. So don't let me keep you if you want to make a release this > week. Artur, Thanks for the update - it sounds like it is probably wise to let this stew a bit and let all the dust settle before we put it into an official release. Cheers, Jes