* [PATCH] super1: add more checks for NodeNumUpdate option
@ 2016-05-11 9:31 Guoqing Jiang
2016-05-12 19:45 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Guoqing Jiang @ 2016-05-11 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jes.Sorensen; +Cc: linux-raid, Guoqing Jiang
There are some cases which didn't need to check the space
is enough or not for NodeNumUpdate option.
1. for array which does not have clustered bitmap.
2. "--nodes" parameter is 0 (eg, add a disk to clustered raid).
3. if "--nodes" parameter is set to a smaller num than
current bms->nodes.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
---
super1.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/super1.c b/super1.c
index fa93367..3d25fae 100644
--- a/super1.c
+++ b/super1.c
@@ -2394,9 +2394,25 @@ static int write_bitmap1(struct supertype *st, int fd, enum bitmap_update update
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED && st->nodes <= 1) {
- pr_err("Warning: cluster-md at least needs two nodes\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (bms->version == BITMAP_MAJOR_CLUSTERED) {
+ if (st->nodes == 1) {
+ /* the parameter for nodes is not valid */
+ pr_err("Warning: cluster-md at least needs two nodes\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (st->nodes == 0)
+ /* --nodes is not specified */
+ break;
+ else if (__cpu_to_le32(st->nodes) < bms->nodes) {
+ /* Since the nodes num is not increased, no need to check the space
+ * is enough or not, just update bms->nodes */
+ bms->nodes = __cpu_to_le32(st->nodes);
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* no need to change bms->nodes for other bitmap types */
+ if (st->nodes)
+ pr_err("Warning: --nodes option is only suitable for clustered bitmap\n");
+ break;
}
/* Each node has an independent bitmap, it is necessary to calculate the
--
2.6.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] super1: add more checks for NodeNumUpdate option
2016-05-11 9:31 [PATCH] super1: add more checks for NodeNumUpdate option Guoqing Jiang
@ 2016-05-12 19:45 ` Jes Sorensen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2016-05-12 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guoqing Jiang; +Cc: linux-raid
Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com> writes:
> There are some cases which didn't need to check the space
> is enough or not for NodeNumUpdate option.
>
> 1. for array which does not have clustered bitmap.
> 2. "--nodes" parameter is 0 (eg, add a disk to clustered raid).
> 3. if "--nodes" parameter is set to a smaller num than
> current bms->nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
> ---
> super1.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied!
Thanks,
Jes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-12 19:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-05-11 9:31 [PATCH] super1: add more checks for NodeNumUpdate option Guoqing Jiang
2016-05-12 19:45 ` Jes Sorensen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).