From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Moyer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support DAX for device-mapper dm-linear devices Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:50:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1465856497-19698-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hpe.com> <1465861755.3504.185.camel@hpe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1465861755.3504.185.camel@hpe.com> (Toshimitsu Kani's message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:59:20 +0000") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Kani, Toshimitsu" Cc: "dan.j.williams@intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "agk@redhat.com" , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "snitzer@redhat.com" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com" , "dm-devel@redhat.com" List-Id: linux-raid.ids "Kani, Toshimitsu" writes: >> I had dm-linear and md-raid0 support on my list of things to look at= , >> did you have raid0 in your plans? > > Yes, I hope to extend further and raid0 is a good candidate. =C2=A0=C2= =A0 dm-flakey would allow more xfstests test cases to run. I'd say that's more important than linear or raid0. ;-) Also, the next step in this work is to then decide how to determine on what numa node an LBA resides. We had discussed this at a prior plumbers conference, and I think the consensus was to use xattrs. Toshi, do you also plan to do that work? Cheers, Jeff