From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"neilb@suse.com" <neilb@suse.com>, "axboe@fb.com" <axboe@fb.com>,
"linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: Add badblock management for gendisks
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 10:37:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49h9kanl7t.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448395840.14996.8.camel@intel.com> (Vishal L. Verma's message of "Tue, 24 Nov 2015 20:10:39 +0000")
"Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 14:14 -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure whether it makes sense to continue without badblock
>> management for the RAID code. I was hoping Neil would comment on
>> that.
>>
>> -Jeff
>
> Not sure I follow? I believe I've kept all the badblocks functionality
> RAID already had..
What I mean to say is that the RAID code had previously embedded the
badblocks structure in one of its other data structures. As a result,
you would never get an allocation failure for it.
> On a related note, something I observed when testing with md:
>
> md's badblock list is per-device, and can be seen at:
> /sys/block/md0/md/dev-pmem0/bad_blocks
>
> Now if we have badblocks in the gendisks too, there is also:
> /sys/block/pmem0/bad_blocks
>
> The two are separate 'accounts' maintained by separate drivers (md for
> the former, and pmem for the latter). This can potentially be
> confusing..
>
> Should we consolidate the two, i.e. make md (re)use the gendisk
> badblocks for its purposes too?
I agree with what Dan said.
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-25 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-21 0:49 [PATCH 0/3] Badblock tracking for gendisks Vishal Verma
2015-11-21 0:49 ` [PATCH 1/3] badblocks: Add core badblock management code Vishal Verma
2015-11-24 19:19 ` Jens Axboe
2015-11-21 0:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: Add badblock management for gendisks Vishal Verma
2015-11-24 15:34 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-11-24 19:03 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-11-24 19:14 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-11-24 20:10 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-11-24 21:31 ` Dan Williams
2015-11-25 15:37 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2015-11-25 17:55 ` Verma, Vishal L
2015-11-25 18:07 ` Jeff Moyer
2015-11-21 0:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] md: convert to use the generic badblocks code Vishal Verma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x49h9kanl7t.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).