From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:19:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120312030412.375458948@fusionio.com> <20120312031305.946211513@fusionio.com> <20120313155120.GG29169@redhat.com> <20120313171414.GJ29169@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120313171414.GJ29169@redhat.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:14:14 -0400") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk List-Id: linux-raid.ids >>>>> "Vivek" == Vivek Goyal writes: Vivek> So first we will get rid of mering discard request We'll get rid of code that doesn't do anything other than confuse. Vivek> and then enable after one release cycle once REQ_COPY support is Vivek> in? The new code will be entirely different. And one cycle is optimistic given the current state of affairs in T10. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering