From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] blk: add plug for blkdev_issue_discard Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 13:04:58 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20120312030412.375458948@fusionio.com> <20120312031305.946211513@fusionio.com> <20120313155120.GG29169@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120313155120.GG29169@redhat.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Tue, 13 Mar 2012 11:51:20 -0400") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Vivek Goyal Cc: Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, "Martin K. Petersen" List-Id: linux-raid.ids >>>>> "Vivek" == Vivek Goyal writes: Vivek> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:04:18AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: >> In raid 0 case, a big discard request is divided into several small >> requests in chunk_size unit. Such requests can be merged in low layer >> if we have correct plug added. This should improve the performance a >> little bit. Vivek> Martin posted a patch to remove the support for allowing merging Vivek> of discard requests. But this seems to be a reasonable use case Vivek> for allowing mering discard requests. CCing Martin. Merging discard requests is hard given how we need to prepare the command payload at the bottom of the stack. The current upstream merge code pretends to be working but it actually doesn't. That's why I want it dead and buried. I have some changes pending (that I need for the REQ_COPY support) that will make merging of non-rw requests easier to deal with. But that's a kernel release cycle away... -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering