Re: [PATCH for-next 2/3] RDMA/rtrs: Fix rxe_dealloc_pd warning

["Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>]

Jinpu

I updated the changes as below, and tested for thousand rounds.

 From d441c0e2496c1795b5af2b6b8ae4672203d6af3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 17:28:28 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/rtrs: Fix rxe_dealloc_pd warning

In current design:
1. PD and clt_path->s.dev are shared among connections.
2. every con[n]'s cleanup phase will call destroy_con_cq_qp()
3. clt_path->s.dev will be always decreased in destroy_con_cq_qp(), and
    when clt_path->s.dev become zero, it will destroy PD.
4. when con[1] failed to create, con[1] will not take clt_path->s.dev,
    but it try to decreased clt_path->s.dev

So, in case create_cm(con[0]) succeeds but create_cm(con[1])
fails, destroy_con_cq_qp(con[1]) will be called first which will destory
the PD while this PD is still taken by con[0].

Here, we refactor the error path of create_cm() and init_conns(), so that
we do the cleanup in the order they are created.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
---
  drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c | 47 +++++++++++---------------
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
index 80abf45a197a..5faf0ecb726b 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c
@@ -2040,6 +2040,7 @@ static int rtrs_clt_rdma_cm_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
  	return 0;
  }
  
+/* The caller should the do the cleanup in case of error */
  static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
  {
  	struct rtrs_path *s = con->c.path;
@@ -2062,14 +2063,14 @@ static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
  	err = rdma_set_reuseaddr(cm_id, 1);
  	if (err != 0) {
  		rtrs_err(s, "Set address reuse failed, err: %d\n", err);
-		goto destroy_cm;
+		return err;
  	}
  	err = rdma_resolve_addr(cm_id, (struct sockaddr *)&clt_path->s.src_addr,
  				(struct sockaddr *)&clt_path->s.dst_addr,
  				RTRS_CONNECT_TIMEOUT_MS);
  	if (err) {
  		rtrs_err(s, "Failed to resolve address, err: %d\n", err);
-		goto destroy_cm;
+		return err;
  	}
  	/*
  	 * Combine connection status and session events. This is needed
@@ -2084,29 +2085,17 @@ static int create_cm(struct rtrs_clt_con *con)
  		if (err == 0)
  			err = -ETIMEDOUT;
  		/* Timedout or interrupted */
-		goto errr;
+		return err;
  	}
  	if (con->cm_err < 0) {
-		err = con->cm_err;
-		goto errr;
+		return con->cm_err;
  	}
  	if (READ_ONCE(clt_path->state) != RTRS_CLT_CONNECTING) {
  		/* Device removal */
-		err = -ECONNABORTED;
-		goto errr;
+		return -ECONNABORTED;
  	}
  
  	return 0;
-
-errr:
-	stop_cm(con);
-	mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
-	destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
-	mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
-destroy_cm:
-	destroy_cm(con);
-
-	return err;
  }
  
  static void rtrs_clt_path_up(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
@@ -2334,7 +2323,7 @@ static void rtrs_clt_close_work(struct work_struct *work)
  static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
  {
  	unsigned int cid;
-	int err;
+	int err, i;
  
  	/*
  	 * On every new session connections increase reconnect counter
@@ -2350,10 +2339,8 @@ static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
  			goto destroy;
  
  		err = create_cm(to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]));
-		if (err) {
-			destroy_con(to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]));
+		if (err)
  			goto destroy;
-		}
  	}
  	err = alloc_path_reqs(clt_path);
  	if (err)
@@ -2364,15 +2351,19 @@ static int init_conns(struct rtrs_clt_path *clt_path)
  	return 0;
  
  destroy:
-	while (cid--) {
+	/* Make sure we do the cleanup in the order they are created */
+	for (i = 0; i <= cid; i++) {
  		struct rtrs_clt_con *con = to_clt_con(clt_path->s.con[cid]);
  
-		stop_cm(con);
-
-		mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
-		destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
-		mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
-		destroy_cm(con);
+		if (!con)
+			break;
+		if (con->c.cm_id) {
+			stop_cm(con);
+			mutex_lock(&con->con_mutex);
+			destroy_con_cq_qp(con);
+			mutex_unlock(&con->con_mutex);
+			destroy_cm(con);
+		}
  		destroy_con(con);
  	}
  	/*
-- 
2.29.2



On 20/04/2023 10:00, Li Zhijian wrote:
> On 19/04/2023 21:20, Jinpu Wang wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:53 AM Zhijian Li (Fujitsu)
>> <lizhijian@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Leon, Guoqing
>>>
>>>
>>> On 18/04/2023 15:57, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>>>>> Currently, without this patch:
>>>>>>> 1. PD and clt_path->s.dev are shared among connections.
>>>>>>> 2. every con[n]'s cleanup phase will call destroy_con_cq_qp()
>>>>>>> 3. clt_path->s.dev will be always decreased in destroy_con_cq_qp(), and when
>>>>>>>        clt_path->s.dev become zero, it will destroy PD.
>>>>>>> 4. when con[1] failed to create, con[1] will not take clt_path->s.dev, but it try to decreased clt_path->s.dev <<< it's wrong to do that.
>>>>>> So please fix it by making sure that failure to create con[1] will
>>>>>> release resources which were allocated. If con[1] didn't increase
>>>>>> s.dev_ref, it shouldn't decrease it either.
>>>>> You are right, the current patch did exactly that.
>>>>> It introduced a con owning flag 'has_dev' to indicate whether this con has taken s.dev.
>>>>> so that its cleanup phase will only decrease its s.dev properly.
>>>> The has_dev is a workaround and not a solution. In proper error unwind
>>>> sequence, you won't need extra flag.