From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steve Wise" Subject: RE: [for-next 1/2] xprtrdma: take reference of rdma provider module Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 14:55:49 -0500 Message-ID: <008101cfa1f9$1b72c9f0$52585dd0$@opengridcomputing.com> References: <1405605697-11583-1-git-send-email-devesh.sharma@emulex.com> <3e39e90f-7095-4eb9-a844-516672a355ad@CMEXHTCAS2.ad.emulex.com> <53C7E546.3080008@opengridcomputing.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823739933FCA3@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <53C81CB7.2030000@oracle.com> <006d01cfa1f2$65d020d0$31706270$@opengridcomputing.com> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823739933FDEA@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A823739933FDEA-P5GAC/sN6hkd3b2yrw5b5LfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-us Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "'Hefty, Sean'" , 'Shirley Ma' , 'Devesh Sharma' , 'Roland Dreier' Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Hefty, Sean [mailto:sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 2:50 PM > To: Steve Wise; 'Shirley Ma'; 'Devesh Sharma'; 'Roland Dreier' > Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; chuck.lever-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > Subject: RE: [for-next 1/2] xprtrdma: take reference of rdma provider module > > > > So the rdma cm is expected to increase the driver reference count > > (try_module_get) for > > > each new cm id, then deference count (module_put) when cm id is > > destroyed? > > > > > > > No, I think he's saying the rdma-cm posts a RDMA_CM_DEVICE_REMOVAL event > > to each > > application with rdmacm objects allocated, and each application is expected > > to destroy all > > the objects it has allocated before returning from the event handler. > > This is almost correct. The applications do not have to destroy all the objects that it has > allocated before returning from their event handler. E.g. an app can queue a work item > that does the destruction. The rdmacm will block in its ib_client remove handler until all > relevant rdma_cm_id's have been destroyed. > Thanks for the clarification. > > And I think the ib_verbs core calls each ib_client's remove handler when an > > rdma provider > > unregisters with the core. > > yes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html