From: "Yanjun.Zhu" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, leon@kernel.org, msanalla@nvidia.com,
maorg@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com,
markzhang@nvidia.com, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
roman.gushchin@linux.dev, wangliang74@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/core: Fix stale RoCE GIDs during netdev events at registration
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:17:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05b40f3c-0d21-411a-b61a-156246482327@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127160000.GG1641016@ziepe.ca>
On 1/27/26 8:00 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 08:14:58PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> On 2026/01/27 18:38, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> RoCE GID entries become stale when netdev properties change during the
>>> IB device registration window. This is reproducible with a udev rule
>>> that sets a MAC address when a VF netdev appears:
>>>
>>> ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="eth4", \
>>> RUN+="/sbin/ip link set eth4 address 88:22:33:44:55:66"
>>>
>>> After VF creation, show_gids displays GIDs derived from the original
>>> random MAC rather than the configured one.
>>>
>>> The root cause is a race between netdev event processing and device
>>> registration:
>>>
>>> CPU 0 (driver) CPU 1 (udev/workqueue)
>>> ────────────── ──────────────────────
>>> ib_register_device()
>>> ib_cache_setup_one()
>>> gid_table_setup_one()
>>> _gid_table_setup_one()
>>> ← GID table allocated
>>> rdma_roce_rescan_device()
>>> ← GIDs populated with
>>> OLD MAC
>>> ip link set eth4 addr NEW_MAC
>>> NETDEV_CHANGEADDR queued
>>> netdevice_event_work_handler()
>>> ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs()
>>> ← Iterates DEVICE_REGISTERED
>>> ← Device NOT marked yet, SKIP!
>>> enable_device_and_get()
>>> xa_set_mark(DEVICE_REGISTERED)
>>> ← Too late, event was lost
>>>
>>> The netdev event handler uses ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs() which only
>>> iterates devices marked DEVICE_REGISTERED. However, this mark is set
>>> late in the registration process, after the GID cache is already
>>> populated. Events arriving in this window are silently dropped.
>>>
>>> Fix this by introducing a new xarray mark DEVICE_GID_UPDATES that is
>>> set immediately after the GID table is allocated and initialized. Use
>>> the new mark in ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs() function to iterate devices
>>> instead of DEVICE_REGISTERED.
>>>
>>> This is safe because:
>>> - After _gid_table_setup_one(), all required structures exist (port_data,
>>> immutable, cache.gid)
>>> - The GID table mutex serializes concurrent access between the initial
>>> rescan and event handlers
>>> - Event handlers correctly update stale GIDs even when racing with rescan
>>> - The mark is cleared in ib_cache_cleanup_one() before teardown
>>>
>>> This also fixes similar races for IP address events (inetaddr_event,
>>> inet6addr_event) which use the same enumeration path.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0df91bb67334 ("RDMA/devices: Use xarray to store the client_data")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> I was thinking making the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event handler valid until
>> wait_for_completion(&device->unreg_completion) in disable_device() returns
>> ( https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b4a09ad8-97cc-4fe1-b02a-6192248694a8@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp ).
>>
>> Since your patch includes what I was trying to address, you can add
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+881d65229ca4f9ae8c84@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=881d65229ca4f9ae8c84
>>
>> lines.
> Can we feed it to syzkaller please and see if it does actually clear
> it's repo? That particular bug already has 5 patches claiming to fix
> it.
#syz test: repository_link branch
The above command will make syzkaller test your commit.
BTW, your commit should be the topmost commit.
Thanks,
Zhu Yanjun
>
> It has become some kind of catch all of all kinds of refcounting errors
>
> [ 247.188486][ T6052] unregister_netdevice: waiting for vcan0 to become free. Usage count = 2
>
> Does this actually change the refcounting around that could fix that?
> Looked like no?
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-27 9:38 [PATCH] RDMA/core: Fix stale RoCE GIDs during netdev events at registration Jiri Pirko
2026-01-27 11:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-27 11:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-27 16:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 21:17 ` Yanjun.Zhu [this message]
2026-01-27 22:16 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-27 22:54 ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-01-28 4:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-28 8:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-28 13:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-29 6:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-29 12:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-29 13:48 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-29 14:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-02 14:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-02 23:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-03 3:52 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-10 8:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-10 10:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-10 15:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-11 1:30 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-03 9:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-28 13:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-24 8:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05b40f3c-0d21-411a-b61a-156246482327@linux.dev \
--to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=markzhang@nvidia.com \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=msanalla@nvidia.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox