public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yanjun.Zhu" <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, leon@kernel.org, msanalla@nvidia.com,
	maorg@nvidia.com, parav@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com,
	markzhang@nvidia.com, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
	roman.gushchin@linux.dev, wangliang74@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RDMA/core: Fix stale RoCE GIDs during netdev events at registration
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:17:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05b40f3c-0d21-411a-b61a-156246482327@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260127160000.GG1641016@ziepe.ca>


On 1/27/26 8:00 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 08:14:58PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> On 2026/01/27 18:38, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> RoCE GID entries become stale when netdev properties change during the
>>> IB device registration window. This is reproducible with a udev rule
>>> that sets a MAC address when a VF netdev appears:
>>>
>>>    ACTION=="add", SUBSYSTEM=="net", KERNEL=="eth4", \
>>>      RUN+="/sbin/ip link set eth4 address 88:22:33:44:55:66"
>>>
>>> After VF creation, show_gids displays GIDs derived from the original
>>> random MAC rather than the configured one.
>>>
>>> The root cause is a race between netdev event processing and device
>>> registration:
>>>
>>>    CPU 0 (driver)                    CPU 1 (udev/workqueue)
>>>    ──────────────                    ──────────────────────
>>>    ib_register_device()
>>>      ib_cache_setup_one()
>>>        gid_table_setup_one()
>>>          _gid_table_setup_one()
>>>            ← GID table allocated
>>>          rdma_roce_rescan_device()
>>>            ← GIDs populated with
>>>              OLD MAC
>>>                                      ip link set eth4 addr NEW_MAC
>>>                                      NETDEV_CHANGEADDR queued
>>>                                      netdevice_event_work_handler()
>>>                                        ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs()
>>>                                          ← Iterates DEVICE_REGISTERED
>>>                                          ← Device NOT marked yet, SKIP!
>>>      enable_device_and_get()
>>>        xa_set_mark(DEVICE_REGISTERED)
>>>            ← Too late, event was lost
>>>
>>> The netdev event handler uses ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs() which only
>>> iterates devices marked DEVICE_REGISTERED. However, this mark is set
>>> late in the registration process, after the GID cache is already
>>> populated. Events arriving in this window are silently dropped.
>>>
>>> Fix this by introducing a new xarray mark DEVICE_GID_UPDATES that is
>>> set immediately after the GID table is allocated and initialized. Use
>>> the new mark in ib_enum_all_roce_netdevs() function to iterate devices
>>> instead of DEVICE_REGISTERED.
>>>
>>> This is safe because:
>>> - After _gid_table_setup_one(), all required structures exist (port_data,
>>>    immutable, cache.gid)
>>> - The GID table mutex serializes concurrent access between the initial
>>>    rescan and event handlers
>>> - Event handlers correctly update stale GIDs even when racing with rescan
>>> - The mark is cleared in ib_cache_cleanup_one() before teardown
>>>
>>> This also fixes similar races for IP address events (inetaddr_event,
>>> inet6addr_event) which use the same enumeration path.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0df91bb67334 ("RDMA/devices: Use xarray to store the client_data")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
>> I was thinking making the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event handler valid until
>> wait_for_completion(&device->unreg_completion) in disable_device() returns
>> ( https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b4a09ad8-97cc-4fe1-b02a-6192248694a8@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp ).
>>
>> Since your patch includes what I was trying to address, you can add
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+881d65229ca4f9ae8c84@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=881d65229ca4f9ae8c84
>>
>> lines.
> Can we feed it to syzkaller please and see if it does actually clear
> it's repo? That particular bug already has 5 patches claiming to fix
> it.


#syz test: repository_link branch

The above command will make syzkaller test your commit.

BTW, your commit should be the topmost commit.


Thanks,

Zhu Yanjun

>
> It has become some kind of catch all of all kinds of refcounting errors
>
> [  247.188486][ T6052] unregister_netdevice: waiting for vcan0 to become free. Usage count = 2
>
> Does this actually change the refcounting around that could fix that?
> Looked like no?
>
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-27  9:38 [PATCH] RDMA/core: Fix stale RoCE GIDs during netdev events at registration Jiri Pirko
2026-01-27 11:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-27 11:58   ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-27 16:00   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-01-27 21:17     ` Yanjun.Zhu [this message]
2026-01-27 22:16       ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-27 22:54         ` Yanjun.Zhu
2026-01-28  4:52           ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-28  8:26             ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-28 13:40               ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-29  6:06                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-29 12:38                   ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-29 13:48                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-01-29 14:58                       ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-02 14:20                         ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-02 23:51                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-03  3:52                             ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-10  8:58                               ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-10 10:22                                 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-10 15:42                                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-02-11  1:30                                     ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-02-03  9:07                             ` Jiri Pirko
2026-01-28 13:43             ` Jiri Pirko
2026-02-24  8:59 ` Leon Romanovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05b40f3c-0d21-411a-b61a-156246482327@linux.dev \
    --to=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=markzhang@nvidia.com \
    --cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=msanalla@nvidia.com \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=wangliang74@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox