From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net (008.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A39F17D37D; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717186138; cv=none; b=noSTDAreVuW9gf44Xo0BbjUVfLQV2ney6mPA9v8mPxJ1AzDRCvJbEioQw7K89hg0k7ElMJNQXYf7EDbqjrUghvNfmhnejknJJEq76Kcsoe3XdD0w8h2gSbV5R6FAlQ/uT4vyuQac3jA93jxUoGr0PZA1XJtUqpK0TR/H4QFLnlM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717186138; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qJ3xjAYeIM5dfikpUZr//uQG9kmt6nHbhiUKNJJlmYs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=gscLsCfpCihtFlQynRXL8ESiZ05IrrrU/vYEWBnr9C0DzZd8oaZUIk9j2tJFZx557ud2MSvIPtB/Zb8KpX2FkbzX0nANsl4N7lZra2d4lynQEjfQICrvzKwV5p+vGC9HAELhU+7/32IZjxKVLCoqzb0sTr/lwxQr7E41d0TrhRE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=3IRa5vKi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="3IRa5vKi" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VrZ2J2D3lz6CmR43; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:08:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1717186133; x=1719778134; bh=qJ3xjAYeIM5dfikpUZr//uQG 9kmt6nHbhiUKNJJlmYs=; b=3IRa5vKiVTmcMmP2dIBQ+jae48HT3Ok31/z98R+a LHchjQhDyXzYbjUiwRpFHJzxnyQBMM9gvR/0SUxyxpzcUJkkc9repE8a3NjphYpO txMI6Fu6kJhgvXugIai+67m2Zpth3Ll42mTVo0fu1GEx0bAtdeQt3ytJZf5So+g+ MAWAelgAZZ+K32B6020UtQEOgJ/X+wTPx+hRfim7GJSVNT2ZH9oXzcC3b+jl/SZx gGrPYSY7jedbvrN1H9nmTVL88nK25fDPaN9dQKyOmFgi1Joekk0MC+cKfHPjebv5 PVt/IdxV1PEFSaOtSf5usvUUduo2uPGGLoNKHFVKsUTKjw== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 008.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (008.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id xwebMED3Mh0l; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.96.154.26] (unknown [104.132.0.90]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 008.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VrZ2F0RsNz6CmSMs; Fri, 31 May 2024 20:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0a82785a-a417-4f53-8f3a-2a9ad3ab3bf7@acm.org> Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:08:52 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: blktests failures with v6.10-rc1 kernel To: Zhu Yanjun Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "nbd@other.debian.org" , "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" References: <6cd21274-50b3-44c5-af48-179cbd08b1ba@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 5/31/24 13:06, Zhu Yanjun wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:01=E2=80=AFPM Bart Van Assche wrote: >> >> On 5/31/24 07:35, Zhu Yanjun wrote: >>> IIRC, the problem with srp/002, 011 also occurs with siw driver, do y= ou make >>> tests with siw driver to verify whether the problem with srp/002, 011= is also > fixed or not? >> >> I have not yet seen any failures of any of the SRP tests when using th= e siw driver. >> What am I missing? > > (left out a bunch of forwarded emails) Forwarding emails is not useful, especially if these emails do not answer= the question that I asked. Thanks, Bart.