Re: [PATCH v3] RDMA/siw: Fix 64/32bit pointer inconsistency

[Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4282 bytes --]

On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 21:41 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:37:38PM +0200, Bernard Metzler wrote:
> > Fixes improper casting between addresses and unsigned types.
> > Changes siw_pbl_get_buffer() function to return appropriate
> > dma_addr_t, and not u64.
> > 
> > Also fixes debug prints. Now any potentially kernel private
> > pointers are printed formatted as '%pK', to allow keeping that
> > information secret.
> > 
> > Fixes: d941bfe500be ("RDMA/siw: Change CQ flags from 64->32 bits")
> > Fixes: b0fff7317bb4 ("rdma/siw: completion queue methods")
> > Fixes: 8b6a361b8c48 ("rdma/siw: receive path")
> > Fixes: b9be6f18cf9e ("rdma/siw: transmit path")
> > Fixes: f29dd55b0236 ("rdma/siw: queue pair methods")
> > Fixes: 2251334dcac9 ("rdma/siw: application buffer management")
> > Fixes: 303ae1cdfdf7 ("rdma/siw: application interface")
> > Fixes: 6c52fdc244b5 ("rdma/siw: connection management")
> > Fixes: a531975279f3 ("rdma/siw: main include file")
> > 
> > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
> > Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Reported-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Metzler <bmt@zurich.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h       |  8 +--
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c    | 74 ++++++++++++----------
> > -----
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cq.c    |  5 +-
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.c   | 14 ++---
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_mem.h   |  2 +-
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp.c    |  2 +-
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_rx.c | 26 +++++-----
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_qp_tx.c | 43 ++++++++--------
> >  drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_verbs.c | 40 +++++++--------
> >  9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> > b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> > index 77b1aabf6ff3..dba4535494ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw.h
> > @@ -138,9 +138,9 @@ struct siw_umem {
> >  };
> > 
> >  struct siw_pble {
> > -	u64 addr; /* Address of assigned user buffer */
> > -	u64 size; /* Size of this entry */
> > -	u64 pbl_off; /* Total offset from start of PBL */
> > +	dma_addr_t addr; /* Address of assigned buffer */
> > +	unsigned int size; /* Size of this entry */
> > +	unsigned long pbl_off; /* Total offset from start of PBL */
> >  };
> > 
> >  struct siw_pbl {
> > @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static inline void siw_crc_skb(struct
> > siw_rx_stream *srx, unsigned int len)
> >  		  "MEM[0x%08x] %s: " fmt, mem->stag, __func__,
> > ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > 
> >  #define siw_dbg_cep(cep, fmt,
> > ...)                                             \
> > -	ibdev_dbg(&cep->sdev->base_dev, "CEP[0x%p] %s: "
> > fmt,                  \
> > +	ibdev_dbg(&cep->sdev->base_dev, "CEP[0x%pK] %s: "
> > fmt,                  \
> >  		  cep, __func__, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > 
> >  void siw_cq_flush(struct siw_cq *cq);
> > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> > index 9ce8a1b925d2..ae7ea3ad7224 100644
> > --- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/siw/siw_cm.c
> > @@ -355,8 +355,8 @@ static int siw_cm_upcall(struct siw_cep *cep,
> > enum iw_cm_event_type reason,
> >  		getname_local(cep->sock, &event.local_addr);
> >  		getname_peer(cep->sock, &event.remote_addr);
> >  	}
> > -	siw_dbg_cep(cep, "[QP %u]: id 0x%p, reason=%d, status=%d\n",
> > -		    cep->qp ? qp_id(cep->qp) : -1, id, reason, status);
> > +	siw_dbg_cep(cep, "[QP %u]: reason=%d, status=%d\n",
> > +		    cep->qp ? qp_id(cep->qp) : -1, reason, status);
>                                              ^^^^
> There is a chance that such construction (attempt to print -1 with %u)
> will generate some sort of warning.
> 
> Thanks

I didn't see any warnings when I built it.  And %u->-1 would be the same
error on 64bit or 32bit, so I think we're safe here.

Thanks Bernard, it's in my wip/dl-for-rc branch to get 0day testing.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
    GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]