From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27E572BD5A8; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761644030; cv=none; b=TMjxRSpVYd4AEg3M0WwZ3Uhh+Aos3bII25wUqrA9NUg+iPCjXtqLZiuB2Bxx1vHG0L5n+9Om4U7oOihG/PpwSvkH7ebouz0tWdlqJy/mGAnn3E0+YuhGl47n5M1HqxWk6bUdQK4EJFma9S3G6t66UY6WhKWUGhdfzXlQ05FENNU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761644030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gNIoYwnPGl2poq9hJhXrlXgYqCYv7k4kBJYh6yVqD2U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LBpmlq+++MugpFnIOc88bHSe/XWA4TUDYg7iBlTcVJtHlIstnfV2240XQvGhc/cqZaRNEMw4fEyhPiJYYQ1oJnj+mToFfsYiqBj0tP6Vt80o+RBVeCjijzn5xfHXdt49CqgrW8JH//8eVfgHTxQb0wlE4LhlYB9iciuJ7lCK49g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=fb36uv5q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="fb36uv5q" Received: from pps.filterd (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59S1jwrs012355; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:42 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=QRyvVz Y1aSZUvVTazOXD95pRWeNWcRO934GJDJqjh/w=; b=fb36uv5qukFk3JqFvVQvVI GktXEJOPup1juHADYcyswf+EoH7DzRAwm0obR1OBlQb9Dm20auo9s2nluILsI4ew UGIlt6juXUse+EDG8NxxY+KtJwlx/K8PSLpUIs4TmO1WqhduRkES0p9ug4lpDuVI j9gJAD362d9eDnleVN80QTuDOp/53Z0/CLoRSfqkzxvV0csHK8V6nbA+p7KFbhaV N/z+G2ZvwqUWvTac9W+vWp2gl+bTBcom1ONrb9kZlcs6n5BGagLeIlPWBhc4gDgJ /o1uoFNjTd+ia7q9semQNgJ8883sqrOcVCUaQ+UZUtSElYtMgERJCIduUZnJFnDg == Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a0p81u2g1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0353729.ppops.net (m0353729.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.1.12/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 59S9Inhm017991; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:41 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a0p81u2fx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 59S8lXfG030187; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:40 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.9]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a1acjswxn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:39 +0000 Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.100]) by smtprelay07.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 59S9Xces2949800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:38 GMT Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962FD58061; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCFE58057; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.109.248.153] (unknown [9.109.248.153]) by smtpav01.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:33:31 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <0f70d4ff-ad35-42ee-8b99-cf6e3da7c49e@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:03:30 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/2] net/smc: make wr buffer count configurable To: Halil Pasic , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , "D. Wythe" , Dust Li , Sidraya Jayagond , Wenjia Zhang , Tony Lu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Cc: Wen Gu , Guangguan Wang , Bagas Sanjaya References: <20251027224856.2970019-1-pasic@linux.ibm.com> <20251027224856.2970019-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Mahanta Jambigi In-Reply-To: <20251027224856.2970019-2-pasic@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=fIQ0HJae c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=69008df5 cx=c_pps a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:117 a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x6icFKpwvdMA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=SRrdq9N9AAAA:8 a=ffDd5I00xDUYzGQUyCcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: iLJI276jkQYFSUAkCfrGJUpPke3vGuVq X-Proofpoint-GUID: bZgTWHVMeG6WvbqmK9wxllVKaM1ya5qo X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMDI1MDAyNCBTYWx0ZWRfX/RJ3mImZoIyY aTH2y+Y8353xw54oqcdtwUceZzf7eWySn7fGScsF62TaXsiSpp2HZZd1IkjWjmzyS7KyUwHxw8t YC4jJ8k9YjcQ/GJmDIR3UO/9cAFGxQHL9T5m2ht3f6U2wukpKiwmUvd5bqGkfRH9GUeKAlK67kv iB0IGTY+WZnaz4/PNdhw3Bg/XUwiXj6mkmlb9DkSX1VjBaXySSPtugMS3aLdP4ij8gg+y0pQ8I8 S0gQEoJSUVzr3vwTxktDOJJrSeP32IFDVs5cNir/V49lsc5qj1yw118rbe4fHrBvEO/7RVSvidX hC4hpP8kBQLJ9yGrmArlKwdUciWtqWz1IP0T+97clb1FMXhQKAlAQKdVpyBRhNO5jO94TmD4uMs Eqs3tuEx+6vFve/NNyVDL5MH/qQxwQ== X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.80.40 definitions=2025-10-28_03,2025-10-22_01,2025-03-28_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510020000 definitions=main-2510250024 On 28/10/25 4:18 am, Halil Pasic wrote: > Think SMC_WR_BUF_CNT_SEND := SMC_WR_BUF_CNT used in send context and > SMC_WR_BUF_CNT_RECV := 3 * SMC_WR_BUF_CNT used in recv context. Those > get replaced with lgr->max_send_wr and lgr->max_recv_wr respective. > > Please note that although with the default sysctl values > qp_attr.cap.max_send_wr == qp_attr.cap.max_recv_wr is maintained but > can not be assumed to be generally true any more. I see no downside to > that, but my confidence level is rather modest. > > Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic > Reviewed-by: Sidraya Jayagond > Reviewed-by: Dust Li > --- Tested-by: Mahanta Jambigi