Re: compiling against lustre 1.8.2 kernel

["Brian J. Murrell" <Brian.Murrell-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1054 bytes --]

On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 13:32 -0400, Michael Di Domenico wrote: 
> it wouldn't appear so, guess i should have checked that. sorry...  i'm
> little baffled how they can claim it supports ofed 1.4.2 on a
> 2.6.18-146.11.1 kernel if ofed doesn't support a 2.6.18-164.11.1...
> but i digress, that questions for another list...

Indeed, it is, so any followups should be CC'd to
lustre-discuss-aLEFhgZF4x6X6Mz3xDxJMA@public.gmane.org and should likely drop the linux-rdma
list.  Anyone interested in following, can subscribe to lustre-discuss.

But to address the confusion regarding 2.6.18-164.11.1 and the statement
of support for OFED 1.4.2 in the Lustre release notes, the list of
supported OFED releases and supported vendor kernels is not intended to
be a complete and exhaustive matrix.  We can of course, only provide
support where there is upstream support (i.e. intersection).

I have Bcc'd our release manager to have some verbage to that extent
(i.e. that the matrix is not complete) to our future release notes.

Cheers,
b.


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]