From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Dillow Subject: Re: [RFC 0/8] Reliably generate large request from SRP Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:41:24 -0400 Message-ID: <1300311684.18382.17.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov> References: <1295411242-26148-1-git-send-email-dillowda@ornl.gov> <1300148888.2772.15.camel@lap75545.ornl.gov> <4D807472.2060000@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Roland Dreier Cc: Or Gerlitz , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Bart Van Assche List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 09:50 -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > nothing special, just want to make sure that at this point we're talking > > only on patches 1-8 i.e excluding the "increase DMA max_segment_size on > > Mellanox hardware" patch, correct? > > Is there still any concern about that patch possibly being wrong? Or can speak to his concerns, but the mlx4 hunk of the patch should drop the limit to 1 GB as that seems to be a hardware limit. -- Dave Dillow National Center for Computational Science Oak Ridge National Laboratory (865) 241-6602 office -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html