Re: [RFC 1/3] RDMA: Add netlink infrastructure

[Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 20:12 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Joe Perches <joe-6d6DIl74uiNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 19:18 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > One long term goal for me is a generic run-time mechanism
> > to prefix all pr_<level> uses not just the <foo>_dbg ones
> > with or without module or function name.
> > It will also allow the removal of all the uses of
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> > New #define pr_fmt lines need to be added to the current
> > files that use pr_<level> without a prefix so it could
> > take awhile.
> Something like the +m flag documented in
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt;hb=HEAD
> ?

Yes, akin to that, but using /proc not debugfs.

Basically, just per module on/off prefixing of
module name and optionally function name via a
CONFIG_PR_LEVEL_STORE_FUNCTION_NAME.

I'd like to remove all current specific uses of
__func__ in pr_<level> and use per module
/proc controls to add them back as requested.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html