RE: [RFC PATCH 3/5] IB/core: Convert cap_ib_mad to core_cap_flags bit mask

Hefty, Sean
2015-05-04T16:49:43Z

> Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/5] IB/core: Convert cap_ib_mad to core_cap_flags bit
> mask
>
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Use the new Core Capability bits instead of inferring this support from
> the
> protocol.

It would help if the patch description defined what this bit meant. E.g. why aren't more specific definitions (SMI, CM, GSI, PM, etc.) less desirable than just 'MAD'?