public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: re-entry of rds_ib_xmit/rds_iw_xmit
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 11:24:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432999451.114391.157.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432185100-5613-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6476 bytes --]

On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:11 +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> The BUG_ON at line 452/453 is triggered in function rds_send_xmit.
> 
>  441                         while (ret) {
>  442                                 tmp = min_t(int, ret, sg->length -
>  443                                                       conn->c_xmit_data_off);
>  444                                 conn->c_xmit_data_off += tmp;
>  445                                 ret -= tmp;
>  446                                 if (conn->c_xmit_data_off == sg->length) {
>  447                                         conn->c_xmit_data_off = 0;
>  448                                         sg++;
>  449                                         conn->c_xmit_sg++;
>  450                                         if (ret != 0 && conn->c_xmit_sg == rm->data.op_nents)
>  451                                                 printk(KERN_ERR "conn %p rm %p sg %p ret %d\n", conn, rm, sg, ret);
>  452                                         BUG_ON(ret != 0 &&
>  453                                                conn->c_xmit_sg == rm->data.op_nents);
>  454                                 }
>  455                         }
> 
> it is complaining the total sent length is bigger that we want to send.
> 
> rds_ib_xmit() is wrong for the second entry for the same rds_message returning
> wrong value.
> 
> the sg and off passed by rds_send_xmit to rds_ib_xmit is based on
> scatterlist.offset/length, but the rds_ib_xmit action is based on
> scatterlist.dma_address/dma_length. in case dma_length is larger than length
> there is problem. for the 2nd and later entries of rds_ib_xmit for same
> rds_message, at least one of the following two is wrong:
> 
> 1) the scatterlist to start with,  the choosen one can far beyond the correct
>    one.
> 2) the offset to start with within the scatterlist.
> 
> fix:
> add op_dmasg and op_dmaoff to rm_data_op structure indicating the scatterlist
> and offset within the it to start with for rds_ib_xmit respectively. op_dmasg
> and op_dmaoff are initialized to zero when doing dma mapping for the first see
> of the message and are changed when filling send slots.
> 
> the same applies to rds_iw_xmit too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  net/rds/ib_send.c | 17 +++++++++++------
>  net/rds/iw_send.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  net/rds/rds.h     |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_send.c b/net/rds/ib_send.c
> index bd3825d..1df6c84 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_send.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  		}
>  
>  		rds_message_addref(rm);
> +		rm->data.op_dmasg = 0;
> +		rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
>  		ic->i_data_op = &rm->data;
>  
>  		/* Finalize the header */
> @@ -658,7 +660,7 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  	send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
>  	first = send;
>  	prev = NULL;
> -	scat = &ic->i_data_op->op_sg[sg];
> +	scat = &ic->i_data_op->op_sg[rm->data.op_dmasg];
>  	i = 0;
>  	do {
>  		unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -680,17 +682,20 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  		/* Set up the data, if present */
>  		if (i < work_alloc
>  		    && scat != &rm->data.op_sg[rm->data.op_count]) {
> -			len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE, ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - off);
> +			len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE,
> +				ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - rm->data.op_dmaoff);
>  			send->s_wr.num_sge = 2;
>  
> -			send->s_sge[1].addr = ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + off;
> +			send->s_sge[1].addr = ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat);
> +			send->s_sge[1].addr += rm->data.op_dmaoff;
>  			send->s_sge[1].length = len;
>  
>  			bytes_sent += len;
> -			off += len;
> -			if (off == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> +			rm->data.op_dmaoff += len;
> +			if (rm->data.op_dmaoff == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
>  				scat++;
> -				off = 0;
> +				rm->data.op_dmasg++;
> +				rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
>  			}
>  		}
>  
> diff --git a/net/rds/iw_send.c b/net/rds/iw_send.c
> index 1383478..334fe98 100644
> --- a/net/rds/iw_send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/iw_send.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  		ic->i_unsignaled_wrs = rds_iw_sysctl_max_unsig_wrs;
>  		ic->i_unsignaled_bytes = rds_iw_sysctl_max_unsig_bytes;
>  		rds_message_addref(rm);
> +		rm->data.op_dmasg = 0;
> +		rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
>  		ic->i_rm = rm;
>  
>  		/* Finalize the header */
> @@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  	send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
>  	first = send;
>  	prev = NULL;
> -	scat = &rm->data.op_sg[sg];
> +	scat = &rm->data.op_sg[rm->data.op_dmasg];
>  	sent = 0;
>  	i = 0;
>  
> @@ -656,10 +658,11 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  
>  		send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
>  
> -		len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE, ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - off);
> +		len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE,
> +			  ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - rm->data.op_dmaoff);
>  		rds_iw_xmit_populate_wr(ic, send, pos,
> -				ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + off, len,
> -				send_flags);
> +			ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + rm->data.op_dmaoff, len,
> +			send_flags);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * We want to delay signaling completions just enough to get
> @@ -687,10 +690,11 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>  			 &send->s_wr, send->s_wr.num_sge, send->s_wr.next);
>  
>  		sent += len;
> -		off += len;
> -		if (off == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> +		rm->data.op_dmaoff += len;
> +		if (rm->data.op_dmaoff == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
>  			scat++;
> -			off = 0;
> +			rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
> +			rm->data.op_dmasg++;
>  		}
>  
>  add_header:
> diff --git a/net/rds/rds.h b/net/rds/rds.h
> index 0d41155..d2c6009 100644
> --- a/net/rds/rds.h
> +++ b/net/rds/rds.h
> @@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ struct rds_message {
>  			unsigned int		op_active:1;
>  			unsigned int		op_nents;
>  			unsigned int		op_count;
> +			unsigned int		op_dmasg;
> +			unsigned int		op_dmaoff;
>  			struct scatterlist	*op_sg;
>  		} data;
>  	};

This patch looks sane to me.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-30 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-21  5:11 [PATCH] rds: re-entry of rds_ib_xmit/rds_iw_xmit Wengang Wang
     [not found] ` <1432185100-5613-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-25  2:55   ` Wengang Wang
2015-05-30 15:24   ` Doug Ledford [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1432999451.114391.157.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox