From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds: re-entry of rds_ib_xmit/rds_iw_xmit
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 11:24:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1432999451.114391.157.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432185100-5613-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6476 bytes --]
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 13:11 +0800, Wengang Wang wrote:
> The BUG_ON at line 452/453 is triggered in function rds_send_xmit.
>
> 441 while (ret) {
> 442 tmp = min_t(int, ret, sg->length -
> 443 conn->c_xmit_data_off);
> 444 conn->c_xmit_data_off += tmp;
> 445 ret -= tmp;
> 446 if (conn->c_xmit_data_off == sg->length) {
> 447 conn->c_xmit_data_off = 0;
> 448 sg++;
> 449 conn->c_xmit_sg++;
> 450 if (ret != 0 && conn->c_xmit_sg == rm->data.op_nents)
> 451 printk(KERN_ERR "conn %p rm %p sg %p ret %d\n", conn, rm, sg, ret);
> 452 BUG_ON(ret != 0 &&
> 453 conn->c_xmit_sg == rm->data.op_nents);
> 454 }
> 455 }
>
> it is complaining the total sent length is bigger that we want to send.
>
> rds_ib_xmit() is wrong for the second entry for the same rds_message returning
> wrong value.
>
> the sg and off passed by rds_send_xmit to rds_ib_xmit is based on
> scatterlist.offset/length, but the rds_ib_xmit action is based on
> scatterlist.dma_address/dma_length. in case dma_length is larger than length
> there is problem. for the 2nd and later entries of rds_ib_xmit for same
> rds_message, at least one of the following two is wrong:
>
> 1) the scatterlist to start with, the choosen one can far beyond the correct
> one.
> 2) the offset to start with within the scatterlist.
>
> fix:
> add op_dmasg and op_dmaoff to rm_data_op structure indicating the scatterlist
> and offset within the it to start with for rds_ib_xmit respectively. op_dmasg
> and op_dmaoff are initialized to zero when doing dma mapping for the first see
> of the message and are changed when filling send slots.
>
> the same applies to rds_iw_xmit too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> net/rds/ib_send.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> net/rds/iw_send.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> net/rds/rds.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/ib_send.c b/net/rds/ib_send.c
> index bd3825d..1df6c84 100644
> --- a/net/rds/ib_send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/ib_send.c
> @@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> }
>
> rds_message_addref(rm);
> + rm->data.op_dmasg = 0;
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
> ic->i_data_op = &rm->data;
>
> /* Finalize the header */
> @@ -658,7 +660,7 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
> first = send;
> prev = NULL;
> - scat = &ic->i_data_op->op_sg[sg];
> + scat = &ic->i_data_op->op_sg[rm->data.op_dmasg];
> i = 0;
> do {
> unsigned int len = 0;
> @@ -680,17 +682,20 @@ int rds_ib_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> /* Set up the data, if present */
> if (i < work_alloc
> && scat != &rm->data.op_sg[rm->data.op_count]) {
> - len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE, ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - off);
> + len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE,
> + ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - rm->data.op_dmaoff);
> send->s_wr.num_sge = 2;
>
> - send->s_sge[1].addr = ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + off;
> + send->s_sge[1].addr = ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat);
> + send->s_sge[1].addr += rm->data.op_dmaoff;
> send->s_sge[1].length = len;
>
> bytes_sent += len;
> - off += len;
> - if (off == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff += len;
> + if (rm->data.op_dmaoff == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> scat++;
> - off = 0;
> + rm->data.op_dmasg++;
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/iw_send.c b/net/rds/iw_send.c
> index 1383478..334fe98 100644
> --- a/net/rds/iw_send.c
> +++ b/net/rds/iw_send.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,8 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> ic->i_unsignaled_wrs = rds_iw_sysctl_max_unsig_wrs;
> ic->i_unsignaled_bytes = rds_iw_sysctl_max_unsig_bytes;
> rds_message_addref(rm);
> + rm->data.op_dmasg = 0;
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
> ic->i_rm = rm;
>
> /* Finalize the header */
> @@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
> first = send;
> prev = NULL;
> - scat = &rm->data.op_sg[sg];
> + scat = &rm->data.op_sg[rm->data.op_dmasg];
> sent = 0;
> i = 0;
>
> @@ -656,10 +658,11 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
>
> send = &ic->i_sends[pos];
>
> - len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE, ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - off);
> + len = min(RDS_FRAG_SIZE,
> + ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat) - rm->data.op_dmaoff);
> rds_iw_xmit_populate_wr(ic, send, pos,
> - ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + off, len,
> - send_flags);
> + ib_sg_dma_address(dev, scat) + rm->data.op_dmaoff, len,
> + send_flags);
>
> /*
> * We want to delay signaling completions just enough to get
> @@ -687,10 +690,11 @@ int rds_iw_xmit(struct rds_connection *conn, struct rds_message *rm,
> &send->s_wr, send->s_wr.num_sge, send->s_wr.next);
>
> sent += len;
> - off += len;
> - if (off == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff += len;
> + if (rm->data.op_dmaoff == ib_sg_dma_len(dev, scat)) {
> scat++;
> - off = 0;
> + rm->data.op_dmaoff = 0;
> + rm->data.op_dmasg++;
> }
>
> add_header:
> diff --git a/net/rds/rds.h b/net/rds/rds.h
> index 0d41155..d2c6009 100644
> --- a/net/rds/rds.h
> +++ b/net/rds/rds.h
> @@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ struct rds_message {
> unsigned int op_active:1;
> unsigned int op_nents;
> unsigned int op_count;
> + unsigned int op_dmasg;
> + unsigned int op_dmaoff;
> struct scatterlist *op_sg;
> } data;
> };
This patch looks sane to me.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-30 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 5:11 [PATCH] rds: re-entry of rds_ib_xmit/rds_iw_xmit Wengang Wang
[not found] ` <1432185100-5613-1-git-send-email-wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-25 2:55 ` Wengang Wang
2015-05-30 15:24 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1432999451.114391.157.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wen.gang.wang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox