Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] ib_mad: incoming sminfo SMPs gets discarded if no process_mad function is registered

[Knut Omang <knut.omang-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]

On Fri, 2016-09-16 at 13:28 -0700, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On 9/16/2016 11:31 AM, Knut Omang wrote:
> > From: Dag Moxnes <dag.moxnes-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > The process_mad function is an optional IB driver entry point
> > allows a driver to intercept or modify MAD traffic.
> >
> > This fix allows MAD traffic to flow down to the device also
> > when MAD traffic is completely handled by the device and
> > no process_mad function is provided.
> >
> > SIF, the new Oracle Infiniband HCA, is the first HCA
> > where the device itself makes all decision wrt MAD processing.
> > Up till now devices either supports MAD, and do then
> > implement the process_mad entry point, or do not
> > support MAD at all, and then do not implement process_mad.
> >
> > SIF introduces a 3rd case: Supports MAD
> > but do not terminate any MAD requests in the driver.
> > This case is not handled well by the current code.
> >
> > The problem is that the handle_outgoing_dr_smp function
> > has an implicit assumption that some packets are handled
> > by the process_mad function itself.
> >
> > There is no way to provide return values from the process_mad
> > function that ensures that packets are always forwarded to the device,
> > so the only viable solution without breaking the API
> > seems to be to not implement process_mad.
> 
> No SOBs ?

is unfortunately recurring for several of the patches due to a missing -ns to format-patch.
Will fix,

Thanks,
Knut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html