Re: libacm fails to build

[Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 16:54 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Yes, I think so, like this?
> 
> diff --git a/rdma-core.spec b/rdma-core.spec
> index 6519bc370a230a..df65745ff9c468 100644
> --- a/rdma-core.spec
> +++ b/rdma-core.spec
> @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ BuildRequires: valgrind-devel
>  # SuSE releases have it, and sometime around cmake 3.3.2-1.2 the macros learned to use it.
>  BuildRequires: ninja,make
>  %define __builder ninja
> -# cmake_install,make_jobs is specified by opensuse
> +# cmake_install is specified by opensuse. It also specifies make_jobs, but it
> +# doesn't work with __builder as other rpm macro packages define it too.
> +%define make_jobs ninja-build -v %{?_smp_mflags}
>  
>  # Tumbleweed's cmake RPM macro adds -Wl,--no-undefined to the module flags
>  # which is totally inappropriate and breaks building 'ENABLE_EXPORTS' style

If ninja-build is changed into ninja or %{__builder} then I agree :-)

Thanks,

Bart.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html