From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Niranjana Vishwanathapura
<niranjana.vishwanathapura-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Alex Vesker <valex-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V1 0/6] Enhanced mode for IPoIB driver
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 12:24:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493051075.3041.44.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170405140913.2551-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 2017-04-05 at 17:09 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> This patchset mostly comes from Erez with one exception in the first
> patch.
>
> That patch origins from two different commits, first from Niranjana
> who added
> RDMA netdev interface and second from Erez who added IPoIB support.
>
> During the preparation to submission, I squashed their commits into
> one
> and refactored code to allow submission as a standalone topic without
> creating
> dependecies between different submissions. This caused to change in
> author line.
> I hope that it doesn't really matter and it won't stop you from
> merging it.
>
> Per-your request, I based this patch set on v4.11-rc3.
>
> Changes from V0:
> ----------------------
> 1. ipoib_priv function returns struct ipoib_dev_priv * instead of
> void
> 2. Move all the refactoring of netdev_priv to be in single patch
> 3. Change the name of the Formation commit.
> 4. Remove unneeded blank lines
> 5. Set rn->hca on creation.
> 6. Return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP
> 7. Remove hunk with DMA from ib_device struct.
>
> Thanks,
> Leon
>
> CC: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Alex Vesker <valex-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
I pulled the mlx5 changes for this from DaveM's net-next tree, then
applied the Intel VNIC patches, then applied these patches (which
results in conflicts between your first patch and Intel's patches). I
hand fixed those conflicts, so I would double check that you are happy
with how I laid out the struct elements and what not. Otherwise,
thanks, series applied.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-05 14:09 [PATCH rdma-next V1 0/6] Enhanced mode for IPoIB driver Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170405140913.2551-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 1/6] IB/IPoIB: Introduce RDMA netdev interface and IPoIB structs Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 2/6] IB/IPoIB: Separate control and data related initializations Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 3/6] IB/IPoIB: Separate control from HW operation on ipoib_open/stop ndo Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 4/6] IB/IPoIB: Rename qpn to be dqpn in ipoib_send and post_send functions Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 5/6] IB/IPoIB: Use defined function for netdev_priv function Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH rdma-next V1 6/6] IB/IPoIB: Support acceleration options callbacks Leon Romanovsky
2017-04-24 16:24 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493051075.3041.44.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=niranjana.vishwanathapura-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=valex-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).