From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/15] IB/hfi1: hfi1 driver patches for-next Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 19:45:08 -0400 Message-ID: <1493941508.3041.234.camel@redhat.com> References: <20170504120126.32747.45131.stgit@scvm10.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170504120126.32747.45131.stgit-9QXIwq+3FY+1XWohqUldA0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Dennis Dalessandro Cc: Mike Marciniszyn , Jakub Byczkowski , Ira Weiny , Tadeusz Struk , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Tymoteusz Kielan , stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, "Michael J. Ruhl" , Easwar Hariharan , Sebastian Sanchez List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 05:13 -0700, Dennis Dalessandro wrote: > Doug, > > This is a respin of [1] there were some merge problems with the last > 5 in > this series, thanks to Leon for notifciing. > > Included are some contex init/usage fixes, a couple performance > tweaks, and some > general code clean up. This is all confined to the hfi1 driver. > > I'm OK applying this to next vs the current merge window. We might > want to pluck > out patches 6 and 7 for -rc. They are marked as stable and I think > would meet > -rc criteria. I think at least 14/15 should be -rc worthy too unless I read the problem description wrong.  In any case, I took the series.  I'm going to wait for 0day and linux-next before submitting to Linus (probably send it Monday or Tuesday of next week). -- Doug Ledford     GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD     Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html