From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Shiraz Saleem
<shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Bart Van Assche
<Bart.VanAssche-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"Latif,
Faisal" <faisal.latif-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org"
<leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Ismail,
Mustafa" <mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org"
<swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next] Revert "IB/core: Add flow control to the portmapper netlink calls"
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 10:27:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1496672867.7171.146.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602162849.GA28660-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 2017-06-02 at 11:28 -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 02:10:31PM -0600, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2017-05-31 at 12:42 -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > 5. I proposed a solution -> go and fix your user space program.
> > >
> > > This is a kernel patch you are trying to revert, you are breaking
> > > existing
> > > kernel functionality. Nothing to do with user space.
> > >
> > > Bottom line, come up with a solution that will address both port
> > > mapper
> > > functionality and your issue.
> >
> > Hello Shiraz,
> >
> > Sorry that this means additional work for you, but I agree with
> > Leon that
> > user space software should not assume that netlink sockets are a
> > reliable
> > communication mechanism.
>
> Hi Bart - Thank you for your response.
>
> The original problem was that ibnl_unicast, which is used to send nl
> messages from
> portmapper kernel space to user-space, would occasionally and
> momentarily fail under stress.
> We could have retried the call for a certain amount of time, but
> since netlink_unicast has a
> nonblock/block parameter, we chose to use the blocking option with a
> timeout. So we thought we
> did account for deadlocks with this timeout.
Just to be clear, replacing a non-blocking and occasionally dropping
function with a blocking function but with a timeout does not actually
solve the problem, it merely moves the goal post out. It is entirely
possible that you will have the problem again given sufficient load.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-29 8:24 [PATCH rdma-next] Revert "IB/core: Add flow control to the portmapper netlink calls" Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170529082423.1180-1-leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-30 21:24 ` Shiraz Saleem
[not found] ` <20170530212431.GA21008-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 4:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170531040437.GE5406-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 17:42 ` Shiraz Saleem
[not found] ` <20170531174245.GA16304-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 17:46 ` Steve Wise
2017-05-31 18:20 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170531182050.GL5406-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-31 18:34 ` Steve Wise
2017-05-31 20:06 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-05-31 20:10 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <1496261429.2608.15.camel-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-02 16:28 ` Shiraz Saleem
[not found] ` <20170602162849.GA28660-GOXS9JX10wfOxmVO0tvppfooFf0ArEBIu+b9c/7xato@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-03 13:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-06-04 5:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170604053635.GD6868-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 2:23 ` Chien Tin Tung
[not found] ` <20170605022313.GB18172-TZeIlv3TuzOfrEmaQUPKxl95YUYmaKo1UNDiOz3kqAs@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 4:00 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170605040030.GG6868-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 4:20 ` Chien Tin Tung
[not found] ` <20170605042007.GA19068-TZeIlv3TuzOfrEmaQUPKxl95YUYmaKo1UNDiOz3kqAs@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 4:50 ` Chien Tin Tung
[not found] ` <20170605045043.GA17148-TZeIlv3TuzOfrEmaQUPKxl95YUYmaKo1UNDiOz3kqAs@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 6:03 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170605060318.GH6868-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 15:08 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] ` <1496675296.7171.179.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-06 18:17 ` Chien Tin Tung
2017-06-05 14:30 ` Doug Ledford
2017-06-05 14:29 ` Doug Ledford
2017-06-05 14:27 ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2017-06-01 4:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170601041022.GM5406-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-02 16:21 ` Chien Tin Tung
[not found] ` <20170602162103.GA12468-TZeIlv3TuzOfrEmaQUPKxl95YUYmaKo1UNDiOz3kqAs@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-04 5:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
[not found] ` <20170604053123.GC6868-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 2:21 ` Chien Tin Tung
2017-06-05 14:55 ` Doug Ledford
[not found] ` <1496674541.7171.168.camel-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2017-06-05 17:32 ` Leon Romanovsky
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-29 8:26 Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1496672867.7171.146.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=faisal.latif-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leonro-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mustafa.ismail-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shiraz.saleem-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=swise-7bPotxP6k4+P2YhJcF5u+vpXobYPEAuW@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).