From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [rdma-next 01/33] Revert "IB/core: Add flow control to the portmapper netlink calls" Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:20:11 +0000 Message-ID: <1501600807.2475.4.camel@wdc.com> References: <20170801120536.540-1-leon@kernel.org> <20170801120536.540-2-leon@kernel.org> <20170801133832.GA11812@ctung-MOBL3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170801141023.GM13672@mtr-leonro.local> <20170801141842.GA1808@ctung-MOBL3.amr.corp.intel.com> <20170801151511.GA13376@ctung-MOBL3.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170801151511.GA13376-TZeIlv3TuzOfrEmaQUPKxl95YUYmaKo1UNDiOz3kqAs@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-ID: <16AB2B3131ED6C498DB83C748277DF65-+cFlbfsKLD6cE4WynfumptQqCkab/8FMAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "cl-vYTEC60ixJUAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" , "chien.tin.tung-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 10:15 -0500, Chien Tin Tung wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:22:47AM -0500, Christopher Lameter wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, Chien Tin Tung wrote: > >=20 > > > Why do I need to explain the original patch? It was accepted many ke= rnels > > > ago. Your questions on the original were based on false assumptions = and > > > facts which I've proven over and over. You are right in that I do > > > not want to revisit those either. There is a patch that can solve > > > the problem you are facing but yet you insist on the revert. This is > > > very puzzling to me. You simply refuse to move this forward. That > > > is your choice but revert is a no go for me. > >=20 > > Ok this is pretty confusing to someone not involved in the prior > > discussions. Could both of your stop attacking each other and start > > talking about the technical issues? >=20 > There's been multiple threads over this revert. This one is the > latest Leon walked away from: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9814367/ >=20 > I'm simply asking for proof/evidence/facts to back up Leon's claims. > Show me the code/stack trace/whatever and I will be happy to admit wrong > publicly on the list and move on. I do have better things to do than > to NACK a revert. Hello Chien, What Leon wrote, namely that calls that send netlink data from kernel to us= er space should be non-blocking makes sense to me. So please be more construct= ive than replying with "NAK". Thanks, Bart.= -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html