From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: Is ib_mtu iboe_get_mtu() slightly off? Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 12:13:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1507651983.46071.59.camel@redhat.com> References: <1507556073.46071.27.camel@redhat.com> <20171009134131.GB1252@mtr-leonro.local> <1507565652.46071.33.camel@redhat.com> <20171010153312.GD2106@mtr-leonro.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171010153312.GD2106-U/DQcQFIOTAAJjI8aNfphQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Parav Pandit , Roland Dreier , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 18:33 +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:48:01AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On 10/9/2017 4:47 PM, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > > > Sorry for not ACKing that I was doing it last week. > > > If possible, please pick the one that Leon is sending because > > > instead of doing calculation in half comment based and half > > > defined based code, > > > my patch defines all necessary header sizes in calculation, > > > little clean way. > > > > In this instance we are lucky that 0day testing was being slow > > yesterday > > or else this would already be pushed to k.o. Since it's not, I can > > drop > > my patch and take yours. > > Did you post your patch for review and gave enough time to > participants > to provide the feedback, before pushing it to your k.o.? I posted it proir to pushing it to k.o, and it was based on the thread as it stood with about a weeks worth of time for people to comment. -- Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html