From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Knut Omang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Support for generalized use of make C={1,2} via a wrapper program Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 17:27:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1513441634.31439.34.camel@oracle.com> References: <1513437684.4647.30.camel@perches.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1513437684.4647.30.camel@perches.com> Sender: linux-kbuild-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Nicolas Palix , Jonathan Corbet , Santosh Shilimkar , Matthew Wilcox , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Micka=EBl_Sala=FCn?= , Shuah Khan , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 07:21 -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sat, 2017-12-16 at 15:42 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > > This patch series implements features to make it easier to run checkers on the > > entire kernel as part of automatic and developer testing. > > This seems like a useful and reasonable series, thanks. thanks, appreciated, > Do please take Julia's grammar updates. will do, > How is this series to be applied? I am open for suggestions. Let's leave patch #3 out for now. It's safe to apply #1 (and #2) alone. Patches #4 and #5 only have value once patch #1 is accepted, and I included them in the set for documentation purposes. They don't break anything by getting into the RDMA or RDS subsystem without patch #1, alternatively they can go together with the set of cleanup patches I have prepared for each of RDMA and RDS after #1 is in. Thanks, Knut