From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] RDMA/core: Add runchecks.cfg for drivers/infiniband/core Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:03:51 -0800 Message-ID: <1513623831.31581.121.camel@perches.com> References: <0ce3c307255b22d23f49d13213b76044647e6f60.1513430008.git-series.knut.omang@oracle.com> <20171218080223.GB18894@mtr-leonro.local> <1513600586.22938.29.camel@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1513600586.22938.29.camel-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Knut Omang , Leon Romanovsky Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Jason Gunthorpe , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Doug Ledford , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5kon?= Bugge , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C5smund_=D8stvold?= List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 13:36 +0100, Knut Omang wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-18 at 10:02 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote: [] > > Also, I agree with other reviewers, there is no excuse for adding > > checkpatch specifics per-subsystem/folder, the differences are better > > to be treated in checkpatch.pl itself. What other reviewers are those? As a checkpatch maintainer, I don't believe it's appropriate to add many per-subsystem specific rules to checkpatch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html