From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Copy Offload in NVMe Fabrics with P2P PCI Memory
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 10:26:07 +1100
Message-ID: <1519946767.4592.49.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <20180228234006.21093-1-logang@deltatee.com>
 <1519876489.4592.3.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
 <1519876569.4592.4.camel@au1.ibm.com>
 <CAPcyv4h7mcFphv3j_vW-CGxXa2pjQgLqpBOLzHuTzAFzygai-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1519936477.4592.23.camel@au1.ibm.com>
 <CAPcyv4goHsYytq60ehJUori8Xq+Z0p8dV-8_oRALj244H4YtwQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <2079ba48-5ae5-5b44-cce1-8175712dd395@deltatee.com>
 <43ba615f-a6e1-9444-65e1-494169cb415d@deltatee.com>
 <1519945204.4592.45.camel@au1.ibm.com>
 <595acefb-18fc-e650-e172-bae271263c4c@deltatee.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <595acefb-18fc-e650-e172-bae271263c4c-OTvnGxWRz7hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/linux-nvdimm>,
 <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm>,
 <mailto:linux-nvdimm-request-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "Linux-nvdimm" <linux-nvdimm-bounces-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang-OTvnGxWRz7hWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>, linux-block-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Oliver OHalloran <oliveroh-8fk3Idey6ehBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm-hn68Rpc1hR1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>, linux-rdma <linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Keith Busch <keith.busch-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Glisse <jglisse-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>, Max Gurtovoy <maxg-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2018-03-01 at 16:19 -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:

(Switching back to my non-IBM address ...)

> On 01/03/18 04:00 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > We use only 52 in practice but yes.
> > 
> > >   That's 64PB. If you use need
> > > a sparse vmemmap for the entire space it will take 16TB which leaves you
> > > with 63.98PB of address space left. (Similar calculations for other
> > > numbers of address bits.)
> > 
> > We only have 52 bits of virtual space for the kernel with the radix
> > MMU.
> 
> Ok, assuming you only have 52 bits of physical address space: the sparse 
> vmemmap takes 1TB and you're left with 3.9PB of address space for other 
> things. So, again, why doesn't that work? Is my math wrong

The big problem is not the vmemmap, it's the linear mapping.

Cheers,
Ben.