Re: [PATCH 01/15] ib_srp: Enlarge block layer timeout

David Dillow
2012-05-30T04:56:21Z

On Sat, 2012-05-19 at 10:50 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 04/30/12 15:11, David Dillow wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 16:01 +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 03/29/12 16:59, Dave Dillow wrote:
> >>> I haven't chewed on the rest yet, but would like to see this one at
> >>> least in 3.4 if possible.
> >
> >> If you have further comments about any of the patches in this series,
> >> these are welcome. The 3.5 merge window isn't that far away anymore.
> >
> > I will attend to this before the end of the week, sooner if possible.
>
>
> Hello Dave,
>
> I hope you're still doing fine ?

Yes, but I've been (mostly) under a rock for the past few weeks on
higher priority projects at work. Still, that's no excuse for keeping
you waiting; part of the idea was that I should have faster turn-around
than Roland...

This first patch was approved and should really go into the current
merge window if possible. I remain convinced that we should be able to
do the rest in a cleaner manner, without adding so many additional state
variables. I may be wrong, though.

My family is leaving Saturday for vacation, so I'll take some evening
hours this weekend/early next week and see if I can combine our ideas
into something I'm comfortable with.

Thank you for your exceptional patience,

--
Dave Dillow
National Center for Computational Science
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(865) 241-6602 office