From: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: <dledford@redhat.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 for-next 10/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP reference counting
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:51:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1621925504-33019-11-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621925504-33019-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>
The refcount_t API will WARN on underflow and overflow of a reference
counter, and avoid use-after-free risks.
Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 2 +-
drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
index 24d177c..501b48f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ struct hns_roce_qp {
u32 xrcdn;
- atomic_t refcount;
+ refcount_t refcount;
struct completion free;
struct hns_roce_sge sge;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
index c6e120e..ad26d4d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void flush_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
* make sure we signal QP destroy leg that flush QP was completed
* so that it can safely proceed ahead now and destroy QP
*/
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
complete(&hr_qp->free);
}
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void init_flush_work(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp)
flush_work->hr_dev = hr_dev;
INIT_WORK(&flush_work->work, flush_work_handle);
- atomic_inc(&hr_qp->refcount);
+ refcount_inc(&hr_qp->refcount);
queue_work(hr_dev->irq_workq, &flush_work->work);
}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void hns_roce_qp_event(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 qpn, int event_type)
xa_lock(&hr_dev->qp_table_xa);
qp = __hns_roce_qp_lookup(hr_dev, qpn);
if (qp)
- atomic_inc(&qp->refcount);
+ refcount_inc(&qp->refcount);
xa_unlock(&hr_dev->qp_table_xa);
if (!qp) {
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void hns_roce_qp_event(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 qpn, int event_type)
qp->event(qp, (enum hns_roce_event)event_type);
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&qp->refcount))
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&qp->refcount))
complete(&qp->free);
}
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static int hns_roce_create_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
hr_qp->ibqp.qp_num = hr_qp->qpn;
hr_qp->event = hns_roce_ib_qp_event;
- atomic_set(&hr_qp->refcount, 1);
+ refcount_set(&hr_qp->refcount, 1);
init_completion(&hr_qp->free);
return 0;
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static int hns_roce_create_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
void hns_roce_qp_destroy(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp,
struct ib_udata *udata)
{
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
complete(&hr_qp->free);
wait_for_completion(&hr_qp->free);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-25 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-25 6:51 [PATCH v3 for-next 00/13] RDMA: Use refcount_t for reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 01/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwcm_id_private Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 02/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwpm_admin_data Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 03/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_mad_snoop_private Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 04/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_member Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 05/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_port Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 06/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_group Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 07/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_uverbs_device Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 08/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 09/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ " Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` Weihang Li [this message]
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 11/13] RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for " Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 12/13] RDMA/ipoib: " Weihang Li
2021-05-25 6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 13/13] RDMA/rdmavt: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of rvt_mcast Weihang Li
2021-05-27 13:08 ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-27 13:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-28 3:58 ` liweihang
2021-05-28 7:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-28 8:22 ` liweihang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1621925504-33019-11-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com \
--to=liweihang@huawei.com \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox