public inbox for linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
To: <dledford@redhat.com>, <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <leon@kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 for-next 10/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for QP reference counting
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 14:51:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1621925504-33019-11-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1621925504-33019-1-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com>

The refcount_t API will WARN on underflow and overflow of a reference
counter, and avoid use-after-free risks.

Signed-off-by: Weihang Li <liweihang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h |  2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c     | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
index 24d177c..501b48f 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h
@@ -641,7 +641,7 @@ struct hns_roce_qp {
 
 	u32			xrcdn;
 
-	atomic_t		refcount;
+	refcount_t		refcount;
 	struct completion	free;
 
 	struct hns_roce_sge	sge;
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
index c6e120e..ad26d4d 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void flush_work_handle(struct work_struct *work)
 	 * make sure we signal QP destroy leg that flush QP was completed
 	 * so that it can safely proceed ahead now and destroy QP
 	 */
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
 		complete(&hr_qp->free);
 }
 
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ void init_flush_work(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp)
 
 	flush_work->hr_dev = hr_dev;
 	INIT_WORK(&flush_work->work, flush_work_handle);
-	atomic_inc(&hr_qp->refcount);
+	refcount_inc(&hr_qp->refcount);
 	queue_work(hr_dev->irq_workq, &flush_work->work);
 }
 
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ void hns_roce_qp_event(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 qpn, int event_type)
 	xa_lock(&hr_dev->qp_table_xa);
 	qp = __hns_roce_qp_lookup(hr_dev, qpn);
 	if (qp)
-		atomic_inc(&qp->refcount);
+		refcount_inc(&qp->refcount);
 	xa_unlock(&hr_dev->qp_table_xa);
 
 	if (!qp) {
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void hns_roce_qp_event(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, u32 qpn, int event_type)
 
 	qp->event(qp, (enum hns_roce_event)event_type);
 
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&qp->refcount))
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&qp->refcount))
 		complete(&qp->free);
 }
 
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@ static int hns_roce_create_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
 
 	hr_qp->ibqp.qp_num = hr_qp->qpn;
 	hr_qp->event = hns_roce_ib_qp_event;
-	atomic_set(&hr_qp->refcount, 1);
+	refcount_set(&hr_qp->refcount, 1);
 	init_completion(&hr_qp->free);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static int hns_roce_create_qp_common(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev,
 void hns_roce_qp_destroy(struct hns_roce_dev *hr_dev, struct hns_roce_qp *hr_qp,
 			 struct ib_udata *udata)
 {
-	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&hr_qp->refcount))
 		complete(&hr_qp->free);
 	wait_for_completion(&hr_qp->free);
 
-- 
2.7.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-25  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-25  6:51 [PATCH v3 for-next 00/13] RDMA: Use refcount_t for reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 01/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwcm_id_private Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 02/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of iwpm_admin_data Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 03/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_mad_snoop_private Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 04/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_member Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 05/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_port Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 06/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of mcast_group Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 07/13] RDMA/core: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of ib_uverbs_device Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 08/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for CQ reference counting Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 09/13] RDMA/hns: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for SRQ " Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` Weihang Li [this message]
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 11/13] RDMA/cxgb4: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t for " Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 12/13] RDMA/ipoib: " Weihang Li
2021-05-25  6:51 ` [PATCH v3 for-next 13/13] RDMA/rdmavt: Use refcount_t instead of atomic_t on refcount of rvt_mcast Weihang Li
2021-05-27 13:08   ` Marciniszyn, Mike
2021-05-27 13:15     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-05-28  3:58       ` liweihang
2021-05-28  7:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-05-28  8:22           ` liweihang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1621925504-33019-11-git-send-email-liweihang@huawei.com \
    --to=liweihang@huawei.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox