From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D620CC43217 for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229681AbiLAJKZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 04:10:25 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44350 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229468AbiLAJKY (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Dec 2022 04:10:24 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE2E5DB82; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 01:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14470B81E65; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:10:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 331DFC433D6; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 09:10:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1669885820; bh=B4rSBBn+9jnyDFWA3h9tdw7f7e5sffBAfT1JE8gR29k=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=Bbug4YKhfGPHOQn/6C9j/vx7Tc4DLK/cnBo3bzUFK8KLhcK2nJjsPyDS6RF4Mw7xq EdtjUVO9YmF7cVgJIz19YESD7PUJ3WgCQEFi6qwwoQF4X9fHfAQX0J857nbkHBXVgv Iyr/lDd1kA3f3aIo+UYTYhWvzJCdC07WTFahUKBXCv0TRBtd0lZFL6y/wXtZkqBCre wiHXyQKw5Uptni0YTZWDdCcNwGUCc+xy+seLuGoEz0OP0YLk34gc5QdjDjQ1ZlwBlD G71NNKJE+bdZmHWgffPw3gAMt0oDXRRMgUA07ifP515qkXFoBeVej7l7qsCTJOSjPQ 2puXiD58+Q+jQ== From: Leon Romanovsky To: yang.yang29@zte.com.cn, jgg@ziepe.ca, dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <202211301744378304494@zte.com.cn> References: <202211301744378304494@zte.com.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/hfi1: switch to netif_napi_add() Message-Id: <166988581627.44464.17864367397107451165.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 11:10:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: b4 0.11.0-dev-87e0e Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 17:44:37 +0800 (CST), yang.yang29@zte.com.cn wrote: > From: Yang Yang > > There is no need to use netif_napi_add_weight() when the weight argument > is 64. See "net: drop the weight argument from netif_napi_add". > > Applied, thanks! [1/1] IB/hfi1: switch to netif_napi_add() https://git.kernel.org/rdma/rdma/c/10aa7cd398a9ea Best regards, -- Leon Romanovsky