Linux RDMA and InfiniBand development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
	dust.li@linux.alibaba.com, sidraya@linux.ibm.com,
	wenjia@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org,
	tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, wintera@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Remove validation of reserved bits in CLC Decline message
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:30:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <175694580949.1248581.9851608945779739639.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902082041.98996-1-mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:

On Tue,  2 Sep 2025 10:20:41 +0200 you wrote:
> Currently SMC code is validating the reserved bits while parsing the incoming
> CLC decline message & when this validation fails, its treated as a protocol
> error. As a result, the SMC connection is terminated instead of falling back to
> TCP. As per RFC7609[1] specs we shouldn't be validating the reserved bits that
> is part of CLC message. This patch fixes this issue.
> 
> CLC Decline message format can viewed here[2].
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net,v2] net/smc: Remove validation of reserved bits in CLC Decline message
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/cc282f73bc0c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02  8:20 [PATCH net v2] net/smc: Remove validation of reserved bits in CLC Decline message Mahanta Jambigi
2025-09-04  0:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=175694580949.1248581.9851608945779739639.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox