From: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
"Mark Bloch" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>,
Danielle Costantino <dcostantino@meta.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net/mlx5e: Use standard unit definitions for bandwidth conversion
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:25:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1764498334-1327918-5-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1764498334-1327918-1-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com>
From: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
MLX5E_100MB and MLX5E_1GB defines are confusing, MLX5E_100MB is not
equal to 100 * MEGA, and MLX5E_1GB is not equal to one GIGA, as they
hide the Kbps rate conversion required for ieee_maxrate.
Replace hardcoded bandwidth conversion values with standard unit
definitions from linux/units.h. Rename MLX5E_100MB/MLX5E_1GB to
MLX5E_100MB_TO_KB/MLX5E_1GB_TO_KB to clarify these are conversion
factors to Kbps, not absolute bandwidth values.
Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Nimrod Oren <noren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
---
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dcbnl.c | 17 +++++++++--------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dcbnl.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dcbnl.c
index 79f9d43b09b3..fddf7c207f8e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dcbnl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dcbnl.c
@@ -31,14 +31,15 @@
*/
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/units.h>
#include "en.h"
#include "en/port.h"
#include "en/port_buffer.h"
#define MLX5E_MAX_BW_ALLOC 100 /* Max percentage of BW allocation */
-#define MLX5E_100MB (100000)
-#define MLX5E_1GB (1000000)
+#define MLX5E_100MB_TO_KB (100 * MEGA / KILO)
+#define MLX5E_1GB_TO_KB (GIGA / KILO)
#define MLX5E_CEE_STATE_UP 1
#define MLX5E_CEE_STATE_DOWN 0
@@ -572,10 +573,10 @@ static int mlx5e_dcbnl_ieee_getmaxrate(struct net_device *netdev,
for (i = 0; i <= mlx5_max_tc(mdev); i++) {
switch (max_bw_unit[i]) {
case MLX5_100_MBPS_UNIT:
- maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] = max_bw_value[i] * MLX5E_100MB;
+ maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] = max_bw_value[i] * MLX5E_100MB_TO_KB;
break;
case MLX5_GBPS_UNIT:
- maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] = max_bw_value[i] * MLX5E_1GB;
+ maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] = max_bw_value[i] * MLX5E_1GB_TO_KB;
break;
case MLX5_BW_NO_LIMIT:
break;
@@ -614,8 +615,8 @@ static int mlx5e_dcbnl_ieee_setmaxrate(struct net_device *netdev,
memset(max_bw_value, 0, sizeof(max_bw_value));
memset(max_bw_unit, 0, sizeof(max_bw_unit));
- upper_limit_100mbps = U8_MAX * MLX5E_100MB;
- upper_limit_gbps = U8_MAX * MLX5E_1GB;
+ upper_limit_100mbps = U8_MAX * MLX5E_100MB_TO_KB;
+ upper_limit_gbps = U8_MAX * MLX5E_1GB_TO_KB;
for (i = 0; i <= mlx5_max_tc(mdev); i++) {
if (!maxrate->tc_maxrate[i]) {
@@ -624,12 +625,12 @@ static int mlx5e_dcbnl_ieee_setmaxrate(struct net_device *netdev,
}
if (maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] <= upper_limit_100mbps) {
max_bw_value[i] = div_u64(maxrate->tc_maxrate[i],
- MLX5E_100MB);
+ MLX5E_100MB_TO_KB);
max_bw_value[i] = max_bw_value[i] ? max_bw_value[i] : 1;
max_bw_unit[i] = MLX5_100_MBPS_UNIT;
} else if (maxrate->tc_maxrate[i] <= upper_limit_gbps) {
max_bw_value[i] = div_u64(maxrate->tc_maxrate[i],
- MLX5E_1GB);
+ MLX5E_1GB_TO_KB);
max_bw_unit[i] = MLX5_GBPS_UNIT;
} else {
netdev_err(netdev,
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-30 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-30 10:25 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/mlx5e: Enhance DCBNL get/set maxrate code Tariq Toukan
2025-11-30 10:25 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net/mlx5e: Use u64 instead of __u64 in ieee_setmaxrate Tariq Toukan
2025-11-30 10:25 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net/mlx5e: Rename upper_limit_mbps to upper_limit_100mbps Tariq Toukan
2025-11-30 10:25 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net/mlx5e: Use U8_MAX instead of hard coded magic number Tariq Toukan
2025-11-30 10:25 ` Tariq Toukan [this message]
2025-12-01 23:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net/mlx5e: Enhance DCBNL get/set maxrate code patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1764498334-1327918-5-git-send-email-tariqt@nvidia.com \
--to=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcostantino@meta.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noren@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox