From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A76191F91; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 11:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791286172; cv=none; b=khO1A3WlWZq9EKEjuiSkTk3S0NKhUCTTqpYCRtbDHCH57QcEjthZjsATPChILrwkllaa7r62y18Zobuj3aBqi4+p3sKcj1knZpz2kaaMd+SDGD/y1N2XRV80KCmGytzgHCetv0l859q6RSgln+CQD31YWGyx9Z/lvZA3vdfmKKw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791286172; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gp7PRv3WjAiMJrp0DvXpRvTv3mwC8R3NiezXzUE7FxE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=OC0mr9wpJ3wS2VNr/VYVJv62sJfru6BowRtv1AV3EI7P3HNDgis8/9dkeUqHgVZIBCZhftmB+U1NctqdPSXjXQ4G01/LkWH1bWotFGFNbx7KMP4vC/lI6Ksx30Cy8mkfkxSgeZA705no2/7uUvYpylhLvCZdjaL52EB+/Y/67vg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WOFGM8x6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WOFGM8x6" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 639C61F000FF; Tue, 6 Oct 2026 11:29:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1791286171; bh=Z9zRtXHe/J1k/4/9wAeq1n+PwAt+ioXmV3zyjSNrjDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=WOFGM8x6kH2JIfTclU9clhxH1GiUosxWXNi3s15H8tgseNR/DT9JPR7DLxDXL/+Jw TvrhVqHAP3nK9HXFdZjrs2abL/4ynuoYEjcrxpCvzprSQpY60RKGlzNSWaYUiBi81Q wIb3c+qkRajCIZV1KD/R8xJgJ/8oT3rTFnyw5zd37OWDjzmp+vqNPlH0JPeFugGW8G jiocx76sgTRsBdOq0dAGYXMgCyFXNAuVpPNoQPP8ZM0rgepLFFJYk1H1/A/PXuVXqP G28z6QDRlA0At8eZze2KuoPO+k1QTXN6nqhSxBq8IGHSbryMv7JOaXFsROdiW7OSX0 On5QHf/132Jmg== From: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org To: Tariq Toukan Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni , Edward Srouji , Gal Pressman , Kees Cook , Leon Romanovsky , open list , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Maher Sanalla , Mark Bloch , Moshe Shemesh , Or Har-Toov , Saeed Mahameed , Shay Drori Subject: Re: [PATCH net V2] net/mlx5: Lag, reset vport speed on MPESW teardown Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 11:29:29 +0000 Message-ID: <179128616987.2231598.8807408813571443447@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20261006112415.259157-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> References: <20261006112415.259157-1-tariqt@nvidia.com> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Hi! This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its commit messages seem to be missing some information: - How the issue was discovered, e.g. hit in production, hit during development, syzbot report, manual code inspection, LLM or static analysis tool scan. - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages then. The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think that is the case please reply and explain.