* [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup
@ 2009-10-12 18:57 Stan C. Smith
2009-10-12 21:40 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stan C. Smith @ 2009-10-12 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Sasha Khapyorsky'; +Cc: ofw, 'linux-rdma'
Remove unused ifdef __WIN__ & redundant include.
Signed-off-by: stan smith <stan.smith@intel.com>
diff --git a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
index c6ec955..82a814e 100644
--- a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
+++ b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
@@ -43,19 +43,13 @@
*
*/
-#ifdef __WIN__
-#pragma warning(disable : 4996)
-#endif
-
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
-#ifdef __WIN__
-#include <complib/cl_timer.h>
-#else
+#ifndef __WIN__
#include <strings.h>
-#include <sys/time.h>
#endif
+#include <sys/time.h>
#include <complib/cl_debug.h>
#include "osmtest.h"
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup
2009-10-12 18:57 [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Stan C. Smith
@ 2009-10-12 21:40 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-12 21:49 ` Smith, Stan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-10-12 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stan C. Smith; +Cc: ofw, 'linux-rdma'
On 11:57 Mon 12 Oct , Stan C. Smith wrote:
>
> Remove unused ifdef __WIN__ & redundant include.
>
> Signed-off-by: stan smith <stan.smith@intel.com>
Applied. Thanks. The question is below.
>
> diff --git a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> index c6ec955..82a814e 100644
> --- a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> +++ b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> @@ -43,19 +43,13 @@
> *
> */
>
> -#ifdef __WIN__
> -#pragma warning(disable : 4996)
> -#endif
> -
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> -#ifdef __WIN__
> -#include <complib/cl_timer.h>
> -#else
> +#ifndef __WIN__
> #include <strings.h>
> -#include <sys/time.h>
> #endif
I suppose that windows should have string.h, right? Assuming so could we
remove '#ifndef __WIN__' completely here?
Sasha
> +#include <sys/time.h>
> #include <complib/cl_debug.h>
> #include "osmtest.h"
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup
2009-10-12 21:40 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
@ 2009-10-12 21:49 ` Smith, Stan
2009-10-12 22:07 ` [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-12 22:15 ` [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Sasha Khapyorsky
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Smith, Stan @ 2009-10-12 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Khapyorsky; +Cc: ofw@lists.openfabrics.org, 'linux-rdma'
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> On 11:57 Mon 12 Oct , Stan C. Smith wrote:
>>
>> Remove unused ifdef __WIN__ & redundant include.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: stan smith <stan.smith@intel.com>
>
> Applied. Thanks. The question is below.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
>> index c6ec955..82a814e 100644 --- a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
>> +++ b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
>> @@ -43,19 +43,13 @@
>> *
>> */
>>
>> -#ifdef __WIN__
>> -#pragma warning(disable : 4996)
>> -#endif
>> -
>> #include <stdio.h>
>> #include <stdlib.h>
>> #include <string.h>
>> -#ifdef __WIN__
>> -#include <complib/cl_timer.h>
>> -#else
>> +#ifndef __WIN__
>> #include <strings.h>
>> -#include <sys/time.h>
>> #endif
>
> I suppose that windows should have string.h, right? Assuming so could
> we remove '#ifndef __WIN__' completely here?
Yes - I missed this in the linux env. According to the strings.h file, if string.h is included prior, then strings.h is a nop. Seems the include of strings.h could be removed along with the ifndef __WIN__.
Good catch.
How do you feel about replacing ifndef __WIN__ with ifdef __linux__ in other situations?
>
> Sasha
>
>> +#include <sys/time.h>
>> #include <complib/cl_debug.h>
>> #include "osmtest.h"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion
2009-10-12 21:49 ` Smith, Stan
@ 2009-10-12 22:07 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-12 22:25 ` Smith, Stan
2009-10-12 22:15 ` [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Sasha Khapyorsky
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-10-12 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Smith, Stan; +Cc: ofw@lists.openfabrics.org, 'linux-rdma'
Remove redundant strings.h inclusion (and associated ifndef __WIN__).
Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak@voltaire.com>
---
opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c | 3 ---
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
index 3618ea3..f0f23c7 100644
--- a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
+++ b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
@@ -46,9 +46,6 @@
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
-#ifndef __WIN__
-#include <strings.h>
-#endif
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <complib/cl_debug.h>
#include "osmtest.h"
--
1.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion
2009-10-12 22:07 ` [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion Sasha Khapyorsky
@ 2009-10-12 22:25 ` Smith, Stan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Smith, Stan @ 2009-10-12 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sasha Khapyorsky; +Cc: ofw@lists.openfabrics.org, 'linux-rdma'
Sasha Khapyorsky wrote:
> Remove redundant strings.h inclusion (and associated ifndef __WIN__).
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak@voltaire.com>
> ---
> opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> index 3618ea3..f0f23c7 100644
> --- a/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> +++ b/opensm/osmtest/osmtest.c
> @@ -46,9 +46,6 @@
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> -#ifndef __WIN__
> -#include <strings.h>
> -#endif
> #include <sys/time.h>
> #include <complib/cl_debug.h>
> #include "osmtest.h"
Looking better all the time...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup
2009-10-12 21:49 ` Smith, Stan
2009-10-12 22:07 ` [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion Sasha Khapyorsky
@ 2009-10-12 22:15 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Khapyorsky @ 2009-10-12 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Smith, Stan; +Cc: ofw@lists.openfabrics.org, 'linux-rdma'
On 14:49 Mon 12 Oct , Smith, Stan wrote:
>
> How do you feel about replacing ifndef __WIN__ with ifdef __linux__ in other situations?
He-he :) Don't like this:
1. The current porting is going from linux to windows and not otherwise.
2. 'ifndef __WIN__' is not the same as 'ifdef __LIN__' - there are a
non-linux platforms with pretty compatible development tools (such as
Solaris, MacOSX, couple of embedded-es, etc.).
Sasha
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-12 22:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-12 18:57 [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Stan C. Smith
2009-10-12 21:40 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-12 21:49 ` Smith, Stan
2009-10-12 22:07 ` [PATCH] osmtest/osmtest.c: remove strings.h inclusion Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-12 22:25 ` Smith, Stan
2009-10-12 22:15 ` [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Sasha Khapyorsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox