From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] osmtest - code cleanup Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:15:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20091012221525.GN13830@me> References: <4BFF1A3398A74B2AABB948EF2843BF68@amr.corp.intel.com> <20091012214054.GH13830@me> <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C896BB77@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C896BB77@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: ofw-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org To: "Smith, Stan" Cc: "ofw@lists.openfabrics.org" , 'linux-rdma' List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 14:49 Mon 12 Oct , Smith, Stan wrote: > > How do you feel about replacing ifndef __WIN__ with ifdef __linux__ in other situations? He-he :) Don't like this: 1. The current porting is going from linux to windows and not otherwise. 2. 'ifndef __WIN__' is not the same as 'ifdef __LIN__' - there are a non-linux platforms with pretty compatible development tools (such as Solaris, MacOSX, couple of embedded-es, etc.). Sasha