From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_vendor_ibumad: Use OSM_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS rather than UMAD_CA_MAX_AGENTS Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:28:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20091022132846.GI20210@me> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, stan.smith-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 08:49 Thu 22 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > I thought the subject was sufficient and seems to be included in the > commits. Is that true ? Subject is just *one* line patch summary and not patch description (as you trying to use it). > What are you looking for here that is not > being done ? Specifically the patch motivation was unclear to me. And this is due to violation of patch submitting recommendations: Look at /usr/src/linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches , specifically #2 and #15 in Section 1. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html