From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
stan.smith-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensm/osm_vendor_ibumad: Use OSM_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS rather than UMAD_CA_MAX_AGENTS
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:35:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022133543.GJ20210@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f0e08f230910220549g1035441dj3b89e543c44efd3a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 08:49 Thu 22 Oct , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> >> /****s* OpenSM: Vendor UMAD/osm_ca_info_t
> >> * NAME
> >> * osm_ca_info_t
> >> @@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ typedef struct _osm_vendor {
> >> osm_ca_info_t *p_ca_info;
> >> uint32_t timeout;
> >> int max_retries;
> >> - osm_bind_handle_t agents[UMAD_CA_MAX_AGENTS];
> >> + osm_bind_handle_t agents[OSM_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS];
> >
> > Any reason?
>
> To make the umad vendor layer "stand on its own". This was discussed
> in the Windows porting issues. See thread which ends
> http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/ofw/2009-October/005819.html
I (and guess that many other OpenSM source and change log readers) am
not subscribed on ofw list and unaware about this discussion. Could you
summarize (in the patch change log) what is going on there and what is
motivation for this change?
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-19 15:38 [PATCH] opensm/osm_vendor_ibumad: Use OSM_UMAD_MAX_AGENTS rather than UMAD_CA_MAX_AGENTS Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <20091019153846.GA22111-Wuw85uim5zDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-22 12:21 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-22 12:49 ` Hal Rosenstock
[not found] ` <f0e08f230910220549g1035441dj3b89e543c44efd3a-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-22 13:28 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
2009-10-22 13:35 ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022133543.GJ20210@me \
--to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stan.smith-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox