From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH RDMA] Fixup IPv6 support and IPv4 routing corner cases for RDMA CM Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:46:15 -0600 Message-ID: <20091028164615.GC1966@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20091028054253.GA22882@obsidianresearch.com> <4AE859F8.2030708@Voltaire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AE859F8.2030708-hKgKHo2Ms0FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: "David J. Wilder" , leo.tominna-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, Sean Hefty , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 04:49:28PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > **COMPILE TESTED ONLY** > > any reason why other people have to test for you? Just a preliminary proposal - other people can do whatever they want. Look at the list of things it fixes and decide your self if you want to help or not > > Convert the address resolution process for outgoing connections > > to be very similar to the way the TCP stack does the same operations. > > This fixes many corner case bugs that can crop up. > > rdma_join_multicast(3) states that "before joining a multicast > group, the rdma_cm_id must be bound to an RDMA device by calling > rdma_bind_addr or rdma_resolve_addr", please make sure that this > flow isn't broken by your patch. Can you explain how rdma_resolve_addr is used in conjunction with multicast? I do not understand what the dest would be. Is it just a man page typo? I belive the rdma_bind_addr path is unaffected. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html