From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH RDMA] Fixup IPv6 support and IPv4 routing corner cases for RDMA CM Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:50:43 -0600 Message-ID: <20091028165043.GD1966@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20091028054253.GA22882@obsidianresearch.com> <4E89386C612E46C9A33501CEC2521BAF@amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E89386C612E46C9A33501CEC2521BAF-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sean Hefty Cc: "David J. Wilder" , leo.tominna-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:08:33AM -0700, Sean Hefty wrote: > >Here is how I think this should all go. I can't steal some machines to > >test it right now (prolly can't till after SC|09), but David/Sean maybe > >you can have a look at it? > > I will try to test it some this week. Thanks, probably won't work right away, but I feel it is closer.. Do you have any idea about the ARP things? Is whoever did this originally still around? > >AH, there is still another oopsie I just noticed, rdma_resolve_addr > >does not check that dst_addr and src_addr are the same AF > > I was actually considering making use of this to allow AF_INET or AF_INET6 to > communicate with AF_IB. There's not a protocol limitation to supporting this. Hum.. Not sure how that would work? src = AF_INET, dst = AF_IB? I guess I was hoping you'd be able to do the private data in userspace and avoid those kind of special cases.. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html