From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband-diags/perfquery.c: Fix extended counter reset mask Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:13:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20091102161324.GF21323@me> References: <20091030011708.GQ20136@me> <1361989047.4222321256937573066.JavaMail.root@sz0074a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net> <20091102130305.GA8345@me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 11:23 Mon 02 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky wrote: > > On 18:16 Fri 30 Oct =A0 =A0 , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > >> > >> Because a PMA implementation which follows the IBA recommendation = will > >> reject this > > > > Hmm, where did you find such recommendation where stated that if > > reserved bits are not '0' the request should be rejected (I would r= ather > > expect ignoring of those values at all)? >=20 > I sent a subsequent email indicating there was an errata on this and > that these changes are needed. Let me understand correctly. Do you mean that proposed patch is not needed? Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html