From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [PATCH RDMA] Fixup IPv6 support and IPv4 routing corner cases for RDMA CM Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:04:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20091105170419.GU1966@obsidianresearch.com> References: <20091028054253.GA22882@obsidianresearch.com> <4E89386C612E46C9A33501CEC2521BAF@amr.corp.intel.com> <20091028165043.GD1966@obsidianresearch.com> <20091028185847.GK14520@obsidianresearch.com> <4AF2C361.1080307@voltaire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF2C361.1080307-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Or Gerlitz Cc: Sean Hefty , linux-rdma List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:21:53PM +0200, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > >Well, looking at this, I see that ADDR_CHANGE is only generated on netdev > >events NETDEV_BONDING_FAILOVER - so what are the semantics WRT to UCM > >here? As I said before, defeating the ND process seriously affects how > >bonding works. > Again, much of the rdma-cm essence is to link/bridge/glue the netdev and > rdma stacks. I don't see what it has to do with UCM which you keep > mentioning/repeating over this email/thread and elsewhere. Oops, brian fart, I ment ACM Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html