From: Sasha Khapyorsky <sashak-smomgflXvOZWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Smith, Stan" <stan.smith-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"ofw-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org"
<ofw-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] contain pthreads defs with ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:56:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091106165623.GD7192@me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C8E0D221-osO9UTpF0USkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
On 09:07 Thu 05 Nov , Smith, Stan wrote:
>
> The use of ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD was based on existing HAVE_LIBPTHREAD usage in opensm/include/opensm/osm_stats.h @ line 97.
Right, but it was used due to differences in the functionality between
cl_event_t and pthread stuff. I would be happy to remove those #ifdef's
upon such differences elimination.
> If the community prefers the use of macros then these two patches can be skipped.
I think that macros are nicer.
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 16:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 20:58 [PATCH 1/2] contain pthreads defs with ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD Stan C. Smith
2009-11-04 21:05 ` Sean Hefty
2009-11-04 21:06 ` Sean Hefty
[not found] ` <74DB7ADB8B154DE69B8F65456193D483-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-04 22:42 ` Smith, Stan
2009-11-06 16:58 ` Sasha Khapyorsky
[not found] ` <F9EFFFF3BD1D442AB6AA993FD6F0B5D8-Zpru7NauK7drdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-05 17:07 ` Smith, Stan
[not found] ` <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C8E0D221-osO9UTpF0USkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2009-11-06 16:56 ` Sasha Khapyorsky [this message]
2009-11-06 17:07 ` Smith, Stan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091106165623.GD7192@me \
--to=sashak-smomgflxvozwk0htik3j/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ofw-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org \
--cc=stan.smith-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox