From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] contain pthreads defs with ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:56:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20091106165623.GD7192@me> References: <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C8E0D221@orsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F6F638B8D880340AB536D29CD4C1E1912C8E0D221-osO9UTpF0USkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "Smith, Stan" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "ofw-ZwoEplunGu1OwGhvXhtEPSCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 09:07 Thu 05 Nov , Smith, Stan wrote: > > The use of ifdef HAVE_LIBPTHREAD was based on existing HAVE_LIBPTHREAD usage in opensm/include/opensm/osm_stats.h @ line 97. Right, but it was used due to differences in the functionality between cl_event_t and pthread stuff. I would be happy to remove those #ifdef's upon such differences elimination. > If the community prefers the use of macros then these two patches can be skipped. I think that macros are nicer. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html