From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Khapyorsky Subject: Re: OpenSM: reporting traps 129, 130, 131 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:42:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20091112154213.GH7192@me> References: <4AF6D78E.6080600@dev.mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Hal Rosenstock Cc: kliteyn-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org, Linux RDMA List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 08:46 Thu 12 Nov , Hal Rosenstock wrote: > > > > Any particular reason why there's no reporting of these traps? > > AFAIK it's been this way for at least the last 5 or 6 years. Yes, this is what I found too tracking down git/svn history. > A practical consideration in changing this is that these traps are the > ones for which babbling port was implemented since they do not obey > the trap rate so there's a large downside to adding the reports for > these. If that is to be done, then perhaps this should be done based > on some option. I don't think that we need new option for this, instead we should care that OpenSM is not overloaded by such trap floods. Sasha -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html